head to head · open source

Files vs rclone-manager

Files has 45,642 GitHub stars, 2,936 forks, 458 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. rclone-manager has 1,132 stars, 54 forks, 25 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Files leads on adoption by 3,932% (45,642 vs 1,132 stars). Files is written in C# under MIT; rclone-manager is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0. Files has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, rclone-manager 5%. Files was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Files ★ 46K rclone-manager ★ 1.1K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Files rclone-manager
GitHub stars ★ 46K ★ 1.1K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in C# TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-23 2026-09-23
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 54
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Files if

  • You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Files profile →

pick rclone-manager if

  • You want the rclone-manager feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and rclone-manager fits your workflow better

full rclone-manager profile →

About Files

Files is a modern, MIT licensed file manager for Windows, written in C and maintained by an open source community, for Windows users who want a customizable, actively developed alternative for organising files and folders.

read the full Files overview →

About rclone-manager

RClone Manager is a cross platform, GPL 3.0 licensed graphical application for managing Rclone remotes, built for people who want the capabilities of the Rclone command line tool without working exclusively in a terminal.

read the full rclone-manager overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 206K Excalidraw ★ 133K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 93K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs files localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

Files vs LocalSend Files vs rclone Files vs copyparty Files vs yazi Files vs Spacedrive Files vs Nextcloud Files vs uppy Files vs cloudreve Files vs superfile Files vs ranger Files vs Seafile Files vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is Files or rclone-manager more popular?

Files has 45,642 GitHub stars and rclone-manager has 1,132. Files has the larger community by that measure.

Are Files and rclone-manager free?

Both are open source. Files is licensed under MIT and rclone-manager under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Files and rclone-manager?

Files is written in C# and rclone-manager in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Files or rclone-manager?

Choose Files if you want the larger community (45,642 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose rclone-manager if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.