head to head · open source

Files vs psitransfer

Files has 45,762 GitHub stars, 2,945 forks, 458 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. psitransfer has 1,953 stars, 247 forks, 109 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. Files leads on adoption by 2,243% (45,762 vs 1,953 stars). Files is written in C# under MIT; psitransfer is written in JavaScript under BSD-2-Clause. Files has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, psitransfer 13%. Files was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Files ★ 46K psitransfer ★ 2.0K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Files psitransfer
GitHub stars ★ 46K ★ 2.0K
License MIT BSD-2-Clause
Written in C# JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-24 2026-06-02
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 247
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Files if

  • You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Files profile →

pick psitransfer if

  • You want the psitransfer feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and psitransfer fits your workflow better

full psitransfer profile →

About Files

Files is a modern, MIT licensed file manager for Windows, written in C and maintained by an open source community, for Windows users who want a customizable, actively developed alternative for organising files and folders.

read the full Files overview →

About psitransfer

PsiTransfer is a simple, open source, self hosted file sharing service written in JavaScript under the BSD 2 Clause licence, intended for individuals and teams that want to send large files without accounts, logins or a paid provider.

read the full psitransfer overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 206K Excalidraw ★ 133K RustDesk ★ 125K LocalSend ★ 93K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs files localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

Files vs LocalSend Files vs rclone Files vs copyparty Files vs yazi Files vs Spacedrive Files vs Nextcloud Files vs uppy Files vs cloudreve Files vs superfile Files vs ranger Files vs Seafile Files vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is Files or psitransfer more popular?

Files has 45,762 GitHub stars and psitransfer has 1,953. Files has the larger community by that measure.

Are Files and psitransfer free?

Both are open source. Files is licensed under MIT and psitransfer under BSD-2-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Files and psitransfer?

Files is written in C# and psitransfer in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Files or psitransfer?

Choose Files if you want the larger community (45,762 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose psitransfer if its feature set, stack or BSD-2-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.