head to head · open source

Files vs Hoodik

Files has 45,547 GitHub stars, 2,920 forks, 458 open issues and last shipped today. Hoodik has 1,479 stars, 68 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 22 days ago. Files leads on adoption by 2,980% (45,547 vs 1,479 stars). Files is written in C# under MIT; Hoodik is written in Rust under a custom or non-standard licence. Files has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Hoodik 5%. Files was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Files ★ 46K Hoodik ★ 1.5K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Files Hoodik
GitHub stars ★ 46K ★ 1.5K
License MIT Custom / other
Written in C# Rust
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-08-29
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 68
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Files if

  • You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Files profile →

pick Hoodik if

  • You want the Hoodik feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and Hoodik fits your workflow better

full Hoodik profile →

About Files

Files is a modern, MIT licensed file manager for Windows, written in C and maintained by an open source community, for Windows users who want a customizable, actively developed alternative for organising files and folders.

read the full Files overview →

About Hoodik

Hoodik is a self hosted, end to end encrypted cloud storage server. It lives in the Rust and Vue ecosystem, using Actix web on the backend and Vue 3 on the frontend, and it is packaged as a Docker first service with SQLite or PostgreSQL and S3 compatible storage options.

read the full Hoodik overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

localsend vs files localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

Files vs LocalSend Files vs rclone Files vs copyparty Files vs yazi Files vs Spacedrive Files vs Nextcloud Files vs uppy Files vs cloudreve Files vs superfile Files vs ranger Files vs Seafile Files vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is Files or Hoodik more popular?

Files has 45,547 GitHub stars and Hoodik has 1,479. Files has the larger community by that measure.

Are Files and Hoodik free?

Both are open source. Files is licensed under MIT, and Hoodik has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Files and Hoodik?

Files is written in C# and Hoodik in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Files or Hoodik?

Choose Files if you want the larger community (45,547 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Hoodik if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.