head to head · open source

Files vs Firefiles

Files has 45,547 GitHub stars, 2,920 forks, 458 open issues and last shipped today. Firefiles has 371 stars, 57 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped 11 months ago. Files leads on adoption by 12,177% (45,547 vs 371 stars). Files is written in C# under MIT; Firefiles is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. Files has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Firefiles 15%. Files was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Files ★ 46K Firefiles ★ 371 category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Files Firefiles
GitHub stars ★ 46K ★ 371
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in C# TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2025-11-03
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 57
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Files if

  • You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Files profile →

pick Firefiles if

  • You want the Firefiles feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Firefiles fits your workflow better

full Firefiles profile →

About Files

Files is a modern, MIT licensed file manager for Windows, written in C and maintained by an open source community, for Windows users who want a customizable, actively developed alternative for organising files and folders.

read the full Files overview →

About Firefiles

Firefiles is an open source, self hosted alternative to Dropbox: a TypeScript and Next.js web application that turns your own cloud storage buckets — such as AWS S3, Backblaze, or Firebase Cloud Storage — into a single browser based drive with a familiar file system interface, built for people who want Dropbox style file management while keeping their files in storage they already own.

read the full Firefiles overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

localsend vs files localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

Files vs LocalSend Files vs rclone Files vs copyparty Files vs yazi Files vs Spacedrive Files vs Nextcloud Files vs uppy Files vs cloudreve Files vs superfile Files vs ranger Files vs Seafile Files vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is Files or Firefiles more popular?

Files has 45,547 GitHub stars and Firefiles has 371. Files has the larger community by that measure.

Are Files and Firefiles free?

Both are open source. Files is licensed under MIT and Firefiles under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Files and Firefiles?

Files is written in C# and Firefiles in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Files or Firefiles?

Choose Files if you want the larger community (45,547 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Firefiles if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.