head to head · open source

Files vs cryptgeon

Files has 45,768 GitHub stars, 2,945 forks, 458 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. cryptgeon has 1,543 stars, 161 forks, 15 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Files leads on adoption by 2,866% (45,768 vs 1,543 stars). Files is written in C# under MIT; cryptgeon is written in Svelte under MIT. Files has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, cryptgeon 10%. cryptgeon was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Files ★ 46K cryptgeon ★ 1.5K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Files cryptgeon
GitHub stars ★ 46K ★ 1.5K
License MIT MIT
Written in C# Svelte
Last push 2026-09-24 2026-09-26
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 161
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Files if

  • You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Files profile →

pick cryptgeon if

  • You want the cryptgeon feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Svelte
  • You evaluated both and cryptgeon fits your workflow better

full cryptgeon profile →

About Files

Files is a modern, MIT licensed file manager for Windows, written in C and maintained by an open source community, for Windows users who want a customizable, actively developed alternative for organising files and folders.

read the full Files overview →

About cryptgeon

cryptgeon is a secure, open source note and file sharing service inspired by PrivNote, written in Rust and Svelte, for anyone who wants to send self destructing secrets without trusting the server with the plaintext.

read the full cryptgeon overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 206K Excalidraw ★ 133K RustDesk ★ 125K LocalSend ★ 93K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs files localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

Files vs LocalSend Files vs rclone Files vs copyparty Files vs yazi Files vs Spacedrive Files vs Nextcloud Files vs uppy Files vs cloudreve Files vs superfile Files vs ranger Files vs Seafile Files vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is Files or cryptgeon more popular?

Files has 45,768 GitHub stars and cryptgeon has 1,543. Files has the larger community by that measure.

Are Files and cryptgeon free?

Both are open source. Files is licensed under MIT and cryptgeon under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Files and cryptgeon?

Files is written in C# and cryptgeon in Svelte. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Files or cryptgeon?

Choose Files if you want the larger community (45,768 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose cryptgeon if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.