head to head · open source

Files vs cloudcmd

Files has 45,796 GitHub stars, 2,948 forks, 458 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. cloudcmd has 2,030 stars, 268 forks, 17 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Files leads on adoption by 2,156% (45,796 vs 2,030 stars). Files is written in C# under MIT; cloudcmd is written in JavaScript under MIT. Files has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, cloudcmd 13%. cloudcmd was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (file-manager), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Files ★ 46K cloudcmd ★ 2.0K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Files cloudcmd
GitHub stars ★ 46K ★ 2.0K
License MIT MIT
Written in C# JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-24 2026-09-29
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 268
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Files if

  • You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Files profile →

pick cloudcmd if

  • You want the cloudcmd feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and cloudcmd fits your workflow better

full cloudcmd profile →

About Files

Files is a modern, MIT licensed file manager for Windows, written in C and maintained by an open source community, for Windows users who want a customizable, actively developed alternative for organising files and folders.

read the full Files overview →

About cloudcmd

Cloud Commander is a browser based file manager with an integrated terminal and text editor, built for developers and self hosters who want to manage a machine's filesystem over the web.

read the full cloudcmd overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 207K Excalidraw ★ 133K RustDesk ★ 125K LocalSend ★ 93K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs files localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

Files vs LocalSend Files vs rclone Files vs copyparty Files vs yazi Files vs Spacedrive Files vs Nextcloud Files vs uppy Files vs cloudreve Files vs superfile Files vs ranger Files vs Seafile Files vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is Files or cloudcmd more popular?

Files has 45,796 GitHub stars and cloudcmd has 2,030. Files has the larger community by that measure.

Are Files and cloudcmd free?

Both are open source. Files is licensed under MIT and cloudcmd under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Files and cloudcmd?

Files is written in C# and cloudcmd in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Files or cloudcmd?

Choose Files if you want the larger community (45,796 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose cloudcmd if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.