head to head · open source
alive-progress vs Fider
alive-progress has 6,323 GitHub stars, 242 forks, 20 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. Fider has 4,597 stars, 875 forks, 57 open issues and last shipped yesterday. alive-progress leads on adoption by 38% (6,323 vs 4,597 stars). alive-progress is written in Python under MIT; Fider is written in Go under AGPL-3.0. alive-progress has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, Fider 19%. Fider was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (feedback), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| alive-progress | Fider | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 6.3K | ★ 4.6K |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | Go |
| Last push | 2026-05-24 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 242 | ⑂ 875 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick alive-progress if
- You weight community size — 6.3K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Fider if
- You want the Fider feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and Fider fits your workflow better
About alive-progress
alive progress Have you ever wondered where your lengthy processing was at, and when would it finish? Do you usually hit RETURN several times to make sure it didn't crash, or the SSH connection didn't freeze? Have you ever thought it'd be awesome to be able to pause some processing without hassle, return to the Python prompt to manually fix some items, then seamlessly resume it? I did... I've started this new progress bar thinking about all that, behold the alive progress ! 😃 Introducing the newest concept in progress bars for Python! alive progress is in a class of its own, with an array of cool features that…
read the full alive-progress overview →
About Fider
Fider.io • Fider Feedback • Fider Demo • Docs • Contributing Fider is a feedback portal for feature requests and suggestions. Give your customers a voice and let them tell you what they need. Spend less time guessing and more time building the right product. Getting Started ☁️ Fider Cloud The easiest and quickest way to get started. A fully managed services by the creators of Fider to help you get started in minutes. Forget about managing software updates and patches, we do it all for you! Sign up now 🏢 Self Hosted Install Fider on your own servers, in your own infrastructure. It's totally free, but of course…
read the full Fider overview →
More in Community & Social
Related comparisons
More Collaboration & Feedback projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Feedback field.
Frequently asked questions
Is alive-progress or Fider more popular?
alive-progress has 6,323 GitHub stars and Fider has 4,597. alive-progress has the larger community by that measure.
Are alive-progress and Fider free?
Both are open source. alive-progress is licensed under MIT and Fider under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between alive-progress and Fider?
alive-progress is written in Python and Fider in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, alive-progress or Fider?
Choose alive-progress if you want the larger community (6,323 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Fider if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.