head to head · open source
alive-progress vs guiadofrontend
alive-progress has 6,323 GitHub stars, 242 forks, 20 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. guiadofrontend has 2,912 stars, 258 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. alive-progress leads on adoption by 117% (6,323 vs 2,912 stars). alive-progress is written in Python under MIT; guiadofrontend is written in various languages under MIT. alive-progress has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, guiadofrontend 9%. guiadofrontend was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| alive-progress | guiadofrontend | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 6.3K | ★ 2.9K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | — |
| Last push | 2026-05-24 | 2026-09-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 242 | ⑂ 258 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick alive-progress if
- You weight community size — 6.3K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick guiadofrontend if
- You want the guiadofrontend feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- You evaluated both and guiadofrontend fits your workflow better
About alive-progress
alive progress Have you ever wondered where your lengthy processing was at, and when would it finish? Do you usually hit RETURN several times to make sure it didn't crash, or the SSH connection didn't freeze? Have you ever thought it'd be awesome to be able to pause some processing without hassle, return to the Python prompt to manually fix some items, then seamlessly resume it? I did... I've started this new progress bar thinking about all that, behold the alive progress ! 😃 Introducing the newest concept in progress bars for Python! alive progress is in a class of its own, with an array of cool features that…
read the full alive-progress overview →
About guiadofrontend
Guia do Desenvolvedor Front end :dart: O guia para alavancar a sua carreira Abaixo você encontrará conteúdos para te guiar e ajudar a se torna um desenvolvedor front end, caso você já atue como front end confere o repositório para descobrir novas ferramentas para o seu dia a dia, os caminhos que você pode tomar e as tecnologias para incorporar na sua stack para se tornar um profissional atualizado e diferenciado em front end, faça bom uso do guia e bons estudos! Segue nas redes sociais para acompanhar mais conteúdo: 💌 Doações Olá! Se você está lendo isso, é porque provavelmente já conhece o meu repositório no…
read the full guiadofrontend overview →
More in Community & Social
Related comparisons
More Collaboration & Feedback projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Feedback field.
Frequently asked questions
Is alive-progress or guiadofrontend more popular?
alive-progress has 6,323 GitHub stars and guiadofrontend has 2,912. alive-progress has the larger community by that measure.
Are alive-progress and guiadofrontend free?
Both are open source. alive-progress is licensed under MIT and guiadofrontend under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between alive-progress and guiadofrontend?
alive-progress is written in Python and guiadofrontend in various languages. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, alive-progress or guiadofrontend?
Choose alive-progress if you want the larger community (6,323 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose guiadofrontend if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.