head to head · open source

Mastodon vs core

Mastodon has 50,299 GitHub stars, 7,498 forks, 4,525 open issues and last shipped yesterday. core has 8,833 stars, 2,059 forks, 141 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Mastodon leads on adoption by 469% (50,299 vs 8,833 stars). Mastodon is written in Ruby under AGPL-3.0; core is written in PHP under AGPL-3.0. Mastodon has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, core 23%. Mastodon was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Mastodon ★ 50K core ★ 8.8K category Community & Social

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Mastodon core
GitHub stars ★ 50K ★ 8.8K
License AGPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Ruby PHP
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 7.5K ⑂ 2.1K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Mastodon if

  • You weight community size — 50K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Ruby
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Mastodon profile →

pick core if

  • You want the core feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You evaluated both and core fits your workflow better

full core profile →

About Mastodon

Mastodon is a free, open source, self hosted social network server built on ActivityPub that lets anyone run a microblogging community which interoperates with the wider Fediverse, and it is aimed at individuals, communities, and organisations that want to own their social graph instead of renting it from a platform.

read the full Mastodon overview →

About core

ownCloud Core is the server side component of ownCloud Classic, an open source file platform written in PHP and released under the AGPL 3.0 license. It provides file storage, synchronization, and sharing, and it ships WebDAV, CalDAV, and CardDAV servers alongside a plugin architecture that other ownCloud apps extend. The repository is the main one for ownCloud Classic and serves as the foundation for apps such as Activity, Calendar, and Contacts. Development is stewarded by the Kiteworks Open Source Program Office under the ownCloud brand.

read the full core overview →

More in Community & Social

maigret ★ 38K glance ★ 37K Bluesky ★ 18K Lemmy ★ 15K giscus ★ 12K owncast ★ 12K

Related comparisons

mastodon vs maigret mastodon vs glance mastodon vs bluesky mastodon vs lemmy mastodon vs owncast mastodon vs misskey maigret vs glance giscus vs gamedevmind giscus vs alive-progress giscus vs fider giscus vs guiadofrontend giscus vs guiadobackend giscus vs artalk giscus vs democracyos giscus vs human-review

More Social Networking projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Social Networking field.

Mastodon vs maigret Mastodon vs glance Mastodon vs Bluesky Mastodon vs Lemmy Mastodon vs owncast Mastodon vs misskey Mastodon vs Pixelfed Mastodon vs Infinity-For-Reddit Mastodon vs writefreely Mastodon vs Reddit-Enhancement-Suite Mastodon vs praw Mastodon vs koala

Frequently asked questions

Is Mastodon or core more popular?

Mastodon has 50,299 GitHub stars and core has 8,833. Mastodon has the larger community by that measure.

Are Mastodon and core free?

Both are open source. Mastodon is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and core under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Mastodon and core?

Mastodon is written in Ruby and core in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Mastodon or core?

Choose Mastodon if you want the larger community (50,299 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose core if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.