head to head · open source
alive-progress vs LogChimp
alive-progress has 6,307 GitHub stars, 236 forks, 20 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. LogChimp has 1,127 stars, 211 forks, 185 open issues and last shipped yesterday. alive-progress leads on adoption by 460% (6,307 vs 1,127 stars). alive-progress is written in Python under MIT; LogChimp is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence. alive-progress has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, LogChimp 19%. LogChimp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (feedback), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| alive-progress | LogChimp | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 6.3K | ★ 1.1K |
| License | MIT | Custom / other |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-05-24 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 236 | ⑂ 211 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick alive-progress if
- You weight community size — 6.3K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick LogChimp if
- You want the LogChimp feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and LogChimp fits your workflow better
About alive-progress
alive progress is a Python progress bar library for long running command line processing, aimed at developers who need live throughput, an accurate ETA, and rich terminal animation instead of a static bar.
read the full alive-progress overview →
About LogChimp
LogChimp is an open source, self hosted customer feedback and product roadmap tool in the Community & Social / Collaboration & Feedback category, aimed at product teams and maintainers who want to collect user feedback and organise it into boards and roadmaps on infrastructure they control.
read the full LogChimp overview →
More in Community & Social
Related comparisons
More Collaboration & Feedback projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Feedback field.
Frequently asked questions
Is alive-progress or LogChimp more popular?
alive-progress has 6,307 GitHub stars and LogChimp has 1,127. alive-progress has the larger community by that measure.
Are alive-progress and LogChimp free?
Both are open source. alive-progress is licensed under MIT, and LogChimp has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between alive-progress and LogChimp?
alive-progress is written in Python and LogChimp in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, alive-progress or LogChimp?
Choose alive-progress if you want the larger community (6,307 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose LogChimp if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.