head to head · open source

alive-progress vs guiadobackend

alive-progress has 6,323 GitHub stars, 242 forks, 20 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. guiadobackend has 2,451 stars, 248 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. alive-progress leads on adoption by 158% (6,323 vs 2,451 stars). alive-progress is written in Python under MIT; guiadobackend is written in various languages under MIT. alive-progress has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, guiadobackend 10%. guiadobackend was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

alive-progress ★ 6.3K guiadobackend ★ 2.5K category Community & Social

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

alive-progress guiadobackend
GitHub stars ★ 6.3K ★ 2.5K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python —
Last push 2026-05-24 2026-09-02
Forks ⑂ 242 ⑂ 248
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick alive-progress if

  • You weight community size — 6.3K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full alive-progress profile →

pick guiadobackend if

  • You want the guiadobackend feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • You evaluated both and guiadobackend fits your workflow better

full guiadobackend profile →

About alive-progress

alive progress Have you ever wondered where your lengthy processing was at, and when would it finish? Do you usually hit RETURN several times to make sure it didn't crash, or the SSH connection didn't freeze? Have you ever thought it'd be awesome to be able to pause some processing without hassle, return to the Python prompt to manually fix some items, then seamlessly resume it? I did... I've started this new progress bar thinking about all that, behold the alive progress ! 😃 Introducing the newest concept in progress bars for Python! alive progress is in a class of its own, with an array of cool features that…

read the full alive-progress overview →

About guiadobackend

Guia do Desenvolvedor Back end :dart: O guia para alavancar a sua carreira Abaixo você encontrará conteúdos para te guiar e ajudar a se torna um desenvolvedor back end, caso você já atue como back end confere o repositórios para descobrir novas ferramentas para o seu dia a dia, os caminhos que você pode tomar e as tecnologias para incorporar na sua stack para se tornar um profissional atualizado e diferenciado no back end, faça bom uso do guia e bons estudos! Segue nas redes sociais para acompanhar mais conteúdo: 💌 Doações Olá! Se você está lendo isso, é porque provavelmente já conhece o meu repositório no…

read the full guiadobackend overview →

More in Community & Social

Related comparisons

More Collaboration & Feedback projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Feedback field.

Frequently asked questions

Is alive-progress or guiadobackend more popular?

alive-progress has 6,323 GitHub stars and guiadobackend has 2,451. alive-progress has the larger community by that measure.

Are alive-progress and guiadobackend free?

Both are open source. alive-progress is licensed under MIT and guiadobackend under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between alive-progress and guiadobackend?

alive-progress is written in Python and guiadobackend in various languages. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, alive-progress or guiadobackend?

Choose alive-progress if you want the larger community (6,323 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose guiadobackend if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.