head to head · open source
alive-progress vs human-review
alive-progress has 6,323 GitHub stars, 242 forks, 20 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. human-review has 1,445 stars, 125 forks, 28 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. alive-progress leads on adoption by 338% (6,323 vs 1,445 stars). alive-progress is written in Python under MIT; human-review is written in JavaScript under MIT. alive-progress has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, human-review 9%. human-review was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (cli, feedback), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| alive-progress | human-review | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 6.3K | ★ 1.4K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-05-24 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 242 | ⑂ 125 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick alive-progress if
- You weight community size — 6.3K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick human-review if
- You want the human-review feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and human-review fits your workflow better
About alive-progress
alive progress Have you ever wondered where your lengthy processing was at, and when would it finish? Do you usually hit RETURN several times to make sure it didn't crash, or the SSH connection didn't freeze? Have you ever thought it'd be awesome to be able to pause some processing without hassle, return to the Python prompt to manually fix some items, then seamlessly resume it? I did... I've started this new progress bar thinking about all that, behold the alive progress ! 😃 Introducing the newest concept in progress bars for Python! alive progress is in a class of its own, with an array of cool features that…
read the full alive-progress overview →
About human-review
Human Review Edit HTML and Markdown files directly, leave comments like a Google Doc, and send all your feedback to your AI agent at once. Read the full launch post Problem Giving AI feedback on files in chat is painful. Sometimes you want to change one sentence yourself. Instead, you end up typing: In the third paragraph, change X to Y. Cut the third card because it repeats the first one. Also rewrite the CTA. Then the agent changes the file and you have to check whether it understood every instruction. This gets even harder when you’re reviewing a long plan, Markdown document, landing page, or multi page…
read the full human-review overview →
More in Community & Social
Related comparisons
More Collaboration & Feedback projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Feedback field.
Frequently asked questions
Is alive-progress or human-review more popular?
alive-progress has 6,323 GitHub stars and human-review has 1,445. alive-progress has the larger community by that measure.
Are alive-progress and human-review free?
Both are open source. alive-progress is licensed under MIT and human-review under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between alive-progress and human-review?
alive-progress is written in Python and human-review in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, alive-progress or human-review?
Choose alive-progress if you want the larger community (6,323 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose human-review if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.