head to head · open source
alive-progress vs human-review
alive-progress has 6,307 GitHub stars, 236 forks, 20 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. human-review has 1,268 stars, 102 forks, 28 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. alive-progress leads on adoption by 397% (6,307 vs 1,268 stars). alive-progress is written in Python under MIT; human-review is written in JavaScript under MIT. alive-progress has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, human-review 8%. human-review was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (cli, feedback), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| alive-progress | human-review | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 6.3K | ★ 1.3K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-05-24 | 2026-09-16 |
| Forks | ⑂ 236 | ⑂ 102 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick alive-progress if
- You weight community size — 6.3K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick human-review if
- You want the human-review feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and human-review fits your workflow better
About alive-progress
alive progress is a Python progress bar library for long running command line processing, aimed at developers who need live throughput, an accurate ETA, and rich terminal animation instead of a static bar.
read the full alive-progress overview →
About human-review
Human Review is an open source JavaScript skill and local tool for visually reviewing and editing HTML and Markdown files inside AI coding agent workflows. It lets a person edit text, add comments, and send feedback to an AI agent in one batch. The project lives in the AI agent collaboration ecosystem.
read the full human-review overview →
More in Community & Social
Related comparisons
More Collaboration & Feedback projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Feedback field.
Frequently asked questions
Is alive-progress or human-review more popular?
alive-progress has 6,307 GitHub stars and human-review has 1,268. alive-progress has the larger community by that measure.
Are alive-progress and human-review free?
Both are open source. alive-progress is licensed under MIT and human-review under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between alive-progress and human-review?
alive-progress is written in Python and human-review in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, alive-progress or human-review?
Choose alive-progress if you want the larger community (6,307 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose human-review if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.