head to head · open source

ECC vs validator

ECC has 273,125 GitHub stars, 40,766 forks, 345 open issues and last shipped today. validator has 1,988 stars, 336 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. ECC leads on adoption by 13,639% (273,125 vs 1,988 stars). ECC is written in JavaScript under MIT; validator is written in Java under MIT. ECC has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, validator 17%. ECC was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ECC ★ 273K validator ★ 2.0K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ECC validator
GitHub stars ★ 273K ★ 2.0K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript Java
Last push 2026-10-05 2026-10-02
Forks ⑂ 41K ⑂ 336
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ECC if

  • You weight community size — 273K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ECC profile →

pick validator if

  • You want the validator feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and validator fits your workflow better

full validator profile →

About ECC

ECC is an MIT licensed open source agent harness performance optimization system that gives AI coding agents a coordinated engineering workflow — plan, test, implement, review, verify, remember, improve — for developers working in Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, and other harnesses.

read the full ECC overview →

About validator

The Nu Html Checker (vnu) is an MIT licensed Java tool and HTTP service for catching mistakes in HTML, CSS, and SVG documents, aimed at developers who want command line, scripted, or self hosted web standards validation.

read the full validator overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 212K vscode ★ 194K Langflow ★ 156K pi ★ 113K Supabase ★ 111K

Related comparisons

ecc vs react ecc vs langflow ecc vs supabase ecc vs puppeteer ecc vs nango ecc vs jitsu ecc vs aci-dev ecc vs convertigo ecc vs orbital openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

ECC vs react ECC vs Langflow ECC vs Supabase ECC vs puppeteer ECC vs archify ECC vs PocketBase ECC vs i-have-adhd ECC vs codebase-memory-mcp ECC vs herdr ECC vs ToolJet ECC vs AppSmith ECC vs it-tools

Frequently asked questions

Is ECC or validator more popular?

ECC has 273,125 GitHub stars and validator has 1,988. ECC has the larger community by that measure.

Are ECC and validator free?

Both are open source. ECC is licensed under MIT and validator under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ECC and validator?

ECC is written in JavaScript and validator in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ECC or validator?

Choose ECC if you want the larger community (273,125 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose validator if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.