head to head · open source

ECC vs tirith

ECC has 270,129 GitHub stars, 40,365 forks, 206 open issues and last shipped yesterday. tirith has 2,748 stars, 97 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ECC leads on adoption by 9,730% (270,129 vs 2,748 stars). ECC is written in JavaScript under MIT; tirith is written in Rust under AGPL-3.0. ECC has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, tirith 4%. ECC was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ECC ★ 270K tirith ★ 2.7K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ECC tirith
GitHub stars ★ 270K ★ 2.7K
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in JavaScript Rust
Last push 2026-09-30 2026-09-30
Forks ⑂ 40K ⑂ 97
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ECC if

  • You weight community size — 270K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ECC profile →

pick tirith if

  • You want the tirith feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and tirith fits your workflow better

full tirith profile →

About ECC

ECC is an MIT licensed open source agent harness performance optimization system that gives AI coding agents a coordinated engineering workflow — plan, test, implement, review, verify, remember, improve — for developers working in Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, and other harnesses.

read the full ECC overview →

About tirith

Tirith is an AGPL 3.0 licensed terminal security tool written in Rust that intercepts commands, pasted content and scanned files before they execute, catching homograph URLs, obfuscated payloads, credential exfiltration and malicious AI skills or configs for developers and AI agents working in the shell.

read the full tirith overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 211K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 111K pi ★ 111K

Related comparisons

ecc vs react ecc vs langflow ecc vs supabase ecc vs puppeteer ecc vs nango ecc vs jitsu ecc vs aci-dev ecc vs convertigo ecc vs orbital openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

ECC vs react ECC vs Langflow ECC vs Supabase ECC vs puppeteer ECC vs archify ECC vs PocketBase ECC vs i-have-adhd ECC vs codebase-memory-mcp ECC vs herdr ECC vs ToolJet ECC vs AppSmith ECC vs it-tools

Frequently asked questions

Is ECC or tirith more popular?

ECC has 270,129 GitHub stars and tirith has 2,748. ECC has the larger community by that measure.

Are ECC and tirith free?

Both are open source. ECC is licensed under MIT and tirith under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ECC and tirith?

ECC is written in JavaScript and tirith in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ECC or tirith?

Choose ECC if you want the larger community (270,129 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose tirith if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.