head to head · open source

ECC vs runtime

ECC has 273,125 GitHub stars, 40,766 forks, 345 open issues and last shipped today. runtime has 1,677 stars, 461 forks, 212 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. ECC leads on adoption by 16,187% (273,125 vs 1,677 stars). ECC is written in JavaScript under MIT; runtime is written in Go under Apache-2.0. ECC has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, runtime 27%. ECC was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-agents, llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ECC ★ 273K runtime ★ 1.7K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ECC runtime
GitHub stars ★ 273K ★ 1.7K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript Go
Last push 2026-10-05 2026-10-03
Forks ⑂ 41K ⑂ 461
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ECC if

  • You weight community size — 273K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ECC profile →

pick runtime if

  • You want the runtime feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and runtime fits your workflow better

full runtime profile →

About ECC

ECC is an MIT licensed open source agent harness performance optimization system that gives AI coding agents a coordinated engineering workflow — plan, test, implement, review, verify, remember, improve — for developers working in Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, and other harnesses.

read the full ECC overview →

About runtime

E2B Runtime is the open source Go backend — control plane, Firecracker orchestrator, in VM agent, edge router, and template builder — that powers E2B's AI agent cloud and can be run by anyone on their own hardware.

read the full runtime overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 212K vscode ★ 194K Langflow ★ 156K pi ★ 113K Supabase ★ 111K

Related comparisons

ecc vs react ecc vs langflow ecc vs supabase ecc vs puppeteer ecc vs nango ecc vs jitsu ecc vs aci-dev ecc vs convertigo ecc vs orbital openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

ECC vs react ECC vs Langflow ECC vs Supabase ECC vs puppeteer ECC vs archify ECC vs PocketBase ECC vs i-have-adhd ECC vs codebase-memory-mcp ECC vs herdr ECC vs ToolJet ECC vs AppSmith ECC vs it-tools

Frequently asked questions

Is ECC or runtime more popular?

ECC has 273,125 GitHub stars and runtime has 1,677. ECC has the larger community by that measure.

Are ECC and runtime free?

Both are open source. ECC is licensed under MIT and runtime under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ECC and runtime?

ECC is written in JavaScript and runtime in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ECC or runtime?

Choose ECC if you want the larger community (273,125 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose runtime if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.