head to head · open source

ECC vs patchwork

ECC has 275,030 GitHub stars, 41,030 forks, 372 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. patchwork has 1,579 stars, 108 forks, 201 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. ECC leads on adoption by 17,318% (275,030 vs 1,579 stars). ECC is written in JavaScript under MIT; patchwork is written in Python under AGPL-3.0. ECC has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, patchwork 7%. ECC was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ECC ★ 275K patchwork ★ 1.6K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ECC patchwork
GitHub stars ★ 275K ★ 1.6K
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in JavaScript Python
Last push 2026-10-05 2026-08-24
Forks ⑂ 41K ⑂ 108
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ECC if

  • You weight community size — 275K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ECC profile →

pick patchwork if

  • You want the patchwork feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and patchwork fits your workflow better

full patchwork profile →

About ECC

ECC is an MIT licensed open source agent harness performance optimization system that gives AI coding agents a coordinated engineering workflow — plan, test, implement, review, verify, remember, improve — for developers working in Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, and other harnesses.

read the full ECC overview →

About patchwork

Patchwork is a self hosted, Python based agentic AI framework that automates repetitive development work — pull request reviews, bug fixing, security patching and documentation — for engineering teams who want an LLM driven agent running on their own infrastructure and their own models.

read the full patchwork overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 212K vscode ★ 194K Langflow ★ 156K pi ★ 113K Supabase ★ 111K

Related comparisons

ecc vs react ecc vs langflow ecc vs supabase ecc vs puppeteer ecc vs nango ecc vs jitsu ecc vs aci-dev ecc vs convertigo ecc vs orbital openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

ECC vs react ECC vs Langflow ECC vs Supabase ECC vs puppeteer ECC vs archify ECC vs PocketBase ECC vs i-have-adhd ECC vs codebase-memory-mcp ECC vs herdr ECC vs ToolJet ECC vs AppSmith ECC vs it-tools

Frequently asked questions

Is ECC or patchwork more popular?

ECC has 275,030 GitHub stars and patchwork has 1,579. ECC has the larger community by that measure.

Are ECC and patchwork free?

Both are open source. ECC is licensed under MIT and patchwork under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ECC and patchwork?

ECC is written in JavaScript and patchwork in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ECC or patchwork?

Choose ECC if you want the larger community (275,030 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose patchwork if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.