head to head · open source
ECC vs oxideterm
ECC has 273,125 GitHub stars, 40,766 forks, 345 open issues and last shipped today. oxideterm has 1,631 stars, 130 forks, 35 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ECC leads on adoption by 16,646% (273,125 vs 1,631 stars). ECC is written in JavaScript under MIT; oxideterm is written in Rust under GPL-3.0. ECC has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, oxideterm 8%. ECC was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (mcp), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| ECC | oxideterm | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 273K | ★ 1.6K |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-10-05 | 2026-10-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 41K | ⑂ 130 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick ECC if
- You weight community size — 273K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick oxideterm if
- You want the oxideterm feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and oxideterm fits your workflow better
About ECC
ECC is an MIT licensed open source agent harness performance optimization system that gives AI coding agents a coordinated engineering workflow — plan, test, implement, review, verify, remember, improve — for developers working in Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, and other harnesses.
About oxideterm
OxideTerm is a free, native SSH client and remote operations workspace with a bring your own key AI assistant, written in Rust for developers and sysadmins who work across local shells and remote machines.
read the full oxideterm overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Frameworks & Platforms projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.
Frequently asked questions
Is ECC or oxideterm more popular?
ECC has 273,125 GitHub stars and oxideterm has 1,631. ECC has the larger community by that measure.
Are ECC and oxideterm free?
Both are open source. ECC is licensed under MIT and oxideterm under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between ECC and oxideterm?
ECC is written in JavaScript and oxideterm in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, ECC or oxideterm?
Choose ECC if you want the larger community (273,125 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose oxideterm if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.