head to head · open source

ECC vs OpenDoor

ECC has 267,866 GitHub stars, 40,036 forks, 239 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. OpenDoor has 1,008 stars, 187 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. ECC leads on adoption by 26,474% (267,866 vs 1,008 stars). ECC is written in JavaScript under MIT; OpenDoor is written in Python under GPL-3.0. ECC has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, OpenDoor 19%. ECC was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ECC ★ 268K OpenDoor ★ 1.0K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ECC OpenDoor
GitHub stars ★ 268K ★ 1.0K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in JavaScript Python
Last push 2026-09-24 2026-09-21
Forks ⑂ 40K ⑂ 187
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ECC if

  • You weight community size — 268K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ECC profile →

pick OpenDoor if

  • You want the OpenDoor feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and OpenDoor fits your workflow better

full OpenDoor profile →

About ECC

ECC is an MIT licensed open source agent harness performance optimization system that gives AI coding agents a coordinated engineering workflow — plan, test, implement, review, verify, remember, improve — for developers working in Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, and other harnesses.

read the full ECC overview →

About OpenDoor

OpenDoor is an open source, GPL 3.0 OWASP command line reconnaissance platform, written in Python, that automates directory discovery, subdomain enumeration, fingerprinting and WAF detection for security researchers, penetration testers, bug bounty hunters, DevSecOps engineers and developers working on systems they own or are explicitly authorized to test.

read the full OpenDoor overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 210K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 111K pi ★ 110K

Related comparisons

ecc vs react ecc vs langflow ecc vs supabase ecc vs puppeteer ecc vs nango ecc vs jitsu ecc vs aci-dev ecc vs convertigo ecc vs orbital openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

ECC vs react ECC vs Langflow ECC vs Supabase ECC vs puppeteer ECC vs archify ECC vs PocketBase ECC vs i-have-adhd ECC vs codebase-memory-mcp ECC vs ToolJet ECC vs AppSmith ECC vs herdr ECC vs it-tools

Frequently asked questions

Is ECC or OpenDoor more popular?

ECC has 267,866 GitHub stars and OpenDoor has 1,008. ECC has the larger community by that measure.

Are ECC and OpenDoor free?

Both are open source. ECC is licensed under MIT and OpenDoor under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ECC and OpenDoor?

ECC is written in JavaScript and OpenDoor in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ECC or OpenDoor?

Choose ECC if you want the larger community (267,866 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose OpenDoor if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.