head to head · open source

ECC vs LockKnife

ECC has 271,460 GitHub stars, 40,552 forks, 339 open issues and last shipped yesterday. LockKnife has 542 stars, 120 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 23 days ago. ECC leads on adoption by 49,985% (271,460 vs 542 stars). ECC is written in JavaScript under MIT; LockKnife is written in Python under GPL-3.0. ECC has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, LockKnife 22%. ECC was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (ai-agents, claude, developer-tools), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ECC ★ 271K LockKnife ★ 542 category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ECC LockKnife
GitHub stars ★ 271K ★ 542
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in JavaScript Python
Last push 2026-10-02 2026-09-10
Forks ⑂ 41K ⑂ 120
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ECC if

  • You weight community size — 271K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ECC profile →

pick LockKnife if

  • You want the LockKnife feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and LockKnife fits your workflow better

full LockKnife profile →

About ECC

ECC is an MIT licensed open source agent harness performance optimization system that gives AI coding agents a coordinated engineering workflow — plan, test, implement, review, verify, remember, improve — for developers working in Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, and other harnesses.

read the full ECC overview →

About LockKnife

LockKnife is a unified Android security research toolkit that gives forensic investigators, penetration testers, and reverse engineers a case driven TUI workspace and a headless CLI for extraction, credential recovery, APK analysis, runtime inspection, and reporting from one framework.

read the full LockKnife overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 212K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K pi ★ 112K Supabase ★ 111K

Related comparisons

ecc vs react ecc vs langflow ecc vs supabase ecc vs puppeteer ecc vs nango ecc vs jitsu ecc vs aci-dev ecc vs convertigo ecc vs orbital openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

ECC vs react ECC vs Langflow ECC vs Supabase ECC vs puppeteer ECC vs archify ECC vs PocketBase ECC vs i-have-adhd ECC vs codebase-memory-mcp ECC vs herdr ECC vs ToolJet ECC vs AppSmith ECC vs it-tools

Frequently asked questions

Is ECC or LockKnife more popular?

ECC has 271,460 GitHub stars and LockKnife has 542. ECC has the larger community by that measure.

Are ECC and LockKnife free?

Both are open source. ECC is licensed under MIT and LockKnife under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ECC and LockKnife?

ECC is written in JavaScript and LockKnife in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ECC or LockKnife?

Choose ECC if you want the larger community (271,460 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose LockKnife if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.