head to head · open source

ECC vs lite-server

ECC has 270,282 GitHub stars, 40,398 forks, 215 open issues and last shipped yesterday. lite-server has 2,306 stars, 261 forks, 79 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. ECC leads on adoption by 11,621% (270,282 vs 2,306 stars). ECC is written in JavaScript under MIT; lite-server is written in JavaScript under MIT. ECC has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, lite-server 11%. ECC was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ECC ★ 270K lite-server ★ 2.3K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ECC lite-server
GitHub stars ★ 270K ★ 2.3K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-30 2026-07-17
Forks ⑂ 40K ⑂ 261
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ECC if

  • You weight community size — 270K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ECC profile →

pick lite-server if

  • You want the lite-server feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and lite-server fits your workflow better

full lite-server profile →

About ECC

ECC is an MIT licensed open source agent harness performance optimization system that gives AI coding agents a coordinated engineering workflow — plan, test, implement, review, verify, remember, improve — for developers working in Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, and other harnesses.

read the full ECC overview →

About lite-server

lite server is a lightweight, development only Node.js server for developers building single page applications who need HTML5 route fallback and live browser refresh out of the box.

read the full lite-server overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 211K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 111K pi ★ 111K

Related comparisons

ecc vs react ecc vs langflow ecc vs supabase ecc vs puppeteer ecc vs nango ecc vs jitsu ecc vs aci-dev ecc vs convertigo ecc vs orbital openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

ECC vs react ECC vs Langflow ECC vs Supabase ECC vs puppeteer ECC vs archify ECC vs PocketBase ECC vs i-have-adhd ECC vs codebase-memory-mcp ECC vs herdr ECC vs ToolJet ECC vs AppSmith ECC vs it-tools

Frequently asked questions

Is ECC or lite-server more popular?

ECC has 270,282 GitHub stars and lite-server has 2,306. ECC has the larger community by that measure.

Are ECC and lite-server free?

Both are open source. ECC is licensed under MIT and lite-server under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ECC and lite-server?

ECC is written in JavaScript and lite-server in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ECC or lite-server?

Choose ECC if you want the larger community (270,282 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose lite-server if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.