head to head · open source

ECC vs Graft

ECC has 275,030 GitHub stars, 41,030 forks, 372 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Graft has 9,736 stars, 883 forks, 217 open issues and last shipped today. ECC leads on adoption by 2,725% (275,030 vs 9,736 stars). ECC is written in JavaScript under MIT; Graft is written in TypeScript under MIT. ECC has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, Graft 9%. Graft was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 5 topic tags (ai-agents, anthropic, claude-code, developer-tools), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ECC ★ 275K Graft ★ 9.7K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ECC Graft
GitHub stars ★ 275K ★ 9.7K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-10-05 2026-10-08
Forks ⑂ 41K ⑂ 883
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ECC if

  • You weight community size — 275K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ECC profile →

pick Graft if

  • You want the Graft feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Graft fits your workflow better

full Graft profile →

About ECC

ECC is an MIT licensed open source agent harness performance optimization system that gives AI coding agents a coordinated engineering workflow — plan, test, implement, review, verify, remember, improve — for developers working in Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, and other harnesses.

read the full ECC overview →

About Graft

Graft is an open source TypeScript CLI and MCP server that builds a readable, file based knowledge graph of your repository so coding agents such as Claude Code, Cursor, Codex and Gemini start each task already oriented instead of re exploring the code from scratch.

read the full Graft overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 212K vscode ★ 194K Langflow ★ 156K pi ★ 113K Supabase ★ 111K

Related comparisons

ecc vs react ecc vs langflow ecc vs supabase ecc vs puppeteer ecc vs nango ecc vs jitsu ecc vs aci-dev ecc vs convertigo ecc vs orbital openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

ECC vs react ECC vs Langflow ECC vs Supabase ECC vs puppeteer ECC vs archify ECC vs PocketBase ECC vs i-have-adhd ECC vs codebase-memory-mcp ECC vs herdr ECC vs ToolJet ECC vs AppSmith ECC vs it-tools

Frequently asked questions

Is ECC or Graft more popular?

ECC has 275,030 GitHub stars and Graft has 9,736. ECC has the larger community by that measure.

Are ECC and Graft free?

Both are open source. ECC is licensed under MIT and Graft under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ECC and Graft?

ECC is written in JavaScript and Graft in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ECC or Graft?

Choose ECC if you want the larger community (275,030 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Graft if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.