head to head · open source

ECC vs git-delete-merged-branches

ECC has 301,914 GitHub stars, 44,542 forks, 272 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. git-delete-merged-branches has 921 stars, 24 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. ECC leads on adoption by 32,681% (301,914 vs 921 stars). ECC is written in JavaScript under MIT; git-delete-merged-branches is written in Python under GPL-3.0. ECC has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, git-delete-merged-branches 3%. ECC was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (developer-tools), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ECC ★ 302K git-delete-merged-branches ★ 921 category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ECC git-delete-merged-branches
GitHub stars ★ 302K ★ 921
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in JavaScript Python
Last push 2026-11-09 2026-11-08
Forks ⑂ 45K ⑂ 24
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ECC if

  • You weight community size — 302K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ECC profile →

pick git-delete-merged-branches if

  • You want the git-delete-merged-branches feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and git-delete-merged-branches fits your workflow better

full git-delete-merged-branches profile →

About ECC

Language: English العربية Português (Brasil) 简体中文 繁體中文 日本語 한국어 Türkçe Русский Tiếng Việt ไทย Deutsch Español Українська Polski বাংলা [!WARNING] Official sources only. Install ECC only from verified channels: the GitHub repository github.com/affaan m/ECC, the npm packages ecc universal and ecc agentshield , the GitHub App, the plugin slug ecc@ecc , and the project website ecc.tools. Third party re uploads and unofficial mirrors are not maintained or reviewed by the project and may contain malware. Install with Claude Code Use the guided setup or native plugin commands. Both install the same ecc@ecc plugin. Choose…

read the full ECC overview →

About git-delete-merged-branches

git delete merged branches A convenient command line tool helping you keep repositories clean. Installation If you are using one of the distributions below, you can install git delete merged branches through the respective package manager, e.g.: Example Features Supports deletion of both local and remote branches Detects multiple forms of de facto merges (rebase merges, squash merges (needs effort=3 ), single or range cherry picks… leveraging git cherry ) Supports workflows with multiple release branches, e.g. only delete branches that have been merged to all of master , dev and staging Quick interactive…

read the full git-delete-merged-branches overview →

More in Developer Tools

Related comparisons

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

Frequently asked questions

Is ECC or git-delete-merged-branches more popular?

ECC has 301,914 GitHub stars and git-delete-merged-branches has 921. ECC has the larger community by that measure.

Are ECC and git-delete-merged-branches free?

Both are open source. ECC is licensed under MIT and git-delete-merged-branches under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ECC and git-delete-merged-branches?

ECC is written in JavaScript and git-delete-merged-branches in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ECC or git-delete-merged-branches?

Choose ECC if you want the larger community (301,914 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose git-delete-merged-branches if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.