head to head · open source

ECC vs FreeDomains

ECC has 273,125 GitHub stars, 40,766 forks, 345 open issues and last shipped today. FreeDomains has 12,443 stars, 265 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 19 days ago. ECC leads on adoption by 2,095% (273,125 vs 12,443 stars). ECC is written in JavaScript under MIT; FreeDomains is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0. ECC has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, FreeDomains 2%. ECC was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (developer-tools), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ECC ★ 273K FreeDomains ★ 12K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ECC FreeDomains
GitHub stars ★ 273K ★ 12K
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in JavaScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-10-05 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 41K ⑂ 265
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ECC if

  • You weight community size — 273K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ECC profile →

pick FreeDomains if

  • You want the FreeDomains feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and FreeDomains fits your workflow better

full FreeDomains profile →

About ECC

ECC is an MIT licensed open source agent harness performance optimization system that gives AI coding agents a coordinated engineering workflow — plan, test, implement, review, verify, remember, improve — for developers working in Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, and other harnesses.

read the full ECC overview →

About FreeDomains

Stackryze Domains is a free managed subdomain service that lets developers, students, and open source projects claim a subdomain under shared public suffixes and point it at any hosting provider or their own infrastructure.

read the full FreeDomains overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 212K vscode ★ 194K Langflow ★ 156K pi ★ 113K Supabase ★ 111K

Related comparisons

ecc vs react ecc vs langflow ecc vs supabase ecc vs puppeteer ecc vs nango ecc vs jitsu ecc vs aci-dev ecc vs convertigo ecc vs orbital openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

ECC vs react ECC vs Langflow ECC vs Supabase ECC vs puppeteer ECC vs archify ECC vs PocketBase ECC vs i-have-adhd ECC vs codebase-memory-mcp ECC vs herdr ECC vs ToolJet ECC vs AppSmith ECC vs it-tools

Frequently asked questions

Is ECC or FreeDomains more popular?

ECC has 273,125 GitHub stars and FreeDomains has 12,443. ECC has the larger community by that measure.

Are ECC and FreeDomains free?

Both are open source. ECC is licensed under MIT and FreeDomains under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ECC and FreeDomains?

ECC is written in JavaScript and FreeDomains in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ECC or FreeDomains?

Choose ECC if you want the larger community (273,125 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose FreeDomains if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.