head to head · open source

ECC vs fireworks-tech-graph

ECC has 274,211 GitHub stars, 40,911 forks, 351 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. fireworks-tech-graph has 11,611 stars, 919 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. ECC leads on adoption by 2,262% (274,211 vs 11,611 stars). ECC is written in JavaScript under MIT; fireworks-tech-graph is written in Python under MIT. ECC has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, fireworks-tech-graph 8%. ECC was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (claude-code, developer-tools), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ECC ★ 274K fireworks-tech-graph ★ 12K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ECC fireworks-tech-graph
GitHub stars ★ 274K ★ 12K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript Python
Last push 2026-10-05 2026-09-05
Forks ⑂ 41K ⑂ 919
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ECC if

  • You weight community size — 274K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ECC profile →

pick fireworks-tech-graph if

  • You want the fireworks-tech-graph feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and fireworks-tech-graph fits your workflow better

full fireworks-tech-graph profile →

About ECC

ECC is an MIT licensed open source agent harness performance optimization system that gives AI coding agents a coordinated engineering workflow — plan, test, implement, review, verify, remember, improve — for developers working in Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, and other harnesses.

read the full ECC overview →

About fireworks-tech-graph

fireworks tech graph is an MIT licensed Python Agent Skill for developers and technical writers using Codex or Claude Code that turns English or Chinese prompts into production quality SVG diagrams, PNG exports, SVG to GIF motion, and offline interactive HTML technical diagrams.

read the full fireworks-tech-graph overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 212K vscode ★ 194K Langflow ★ 156K pi ★ 113K Supabase ★ 111K

Related comparisons

ecc vs react ecc vs langflow ecc vs supabase ecc vs puppeteer ecc vs nango ecc vs jitsu ecc vs aci-dev ecc vs convertigo ecc vs orbital openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

ECC vs react ECC vs Langflow ECC vs Supabase ECC vs puppeteer ECC vs archify ECC vs PocketBase ECC vs i-have-adhd ECC vs codebase-memory-mcp ECC vs herdr ECC vs ToolJet ECC vs AppSmith ECC vs it-tools

Frequently asked questions

Is ECC or fireworks-tech-graph more popular?

ECC has 274,211 GitHub stars and fireworks-tech-graph has 11,611. ECC has the larger community by that measure.

Are ECC and fireworks-tech-graph free?

Both are open source. ECC is licensed under MIT and fireworks-tech-graph under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ECC and fireworks-tech-graph?

ECC is written in JavaScript and fireworks-tech-graph in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ECC or fireworks-tech-graph?

Choose ECC if you want the larger community (274,211 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose fireworks-tech-graph if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.