head to head · open source

ECC vs dev3000

ECC has 274,211 GitHub stars, 40,911 forks, 351 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. dev3000 has 1,583 stars, 97 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ECC leads on adoption by 17,222% (274,211 vs 1,583 stars). ECC is written in JavaScript under MIT; dev3000 is written in TypeScript under MIT. ECC has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, dev3000 6%. dev3000 was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ECC ★ 274K dev3000 ★ 1.6K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ECC dev3000
GitHub stars ★ 274K ★ 1.6K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-10-05 2026-10-06
Forks ⑂ 41K ⑂ 97
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ECC if

  • You weight community size — 274K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ECC profile →

pick dev3000 if

  • You want the dev3000 feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and dev3000 fits your workflow better

full dev3000 profile →

About ECC

ECC is an MIT licensed open source agent harness performance optimization system that gives AI coding agents a coordinated engineering workflow — plan, test, implement, review, verify, remember, improve — for developers working in Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, and other harnesses.

read the full ECC overview →

About dev3000

dev3000 (d3k) is an agent first local web debugging runtime for developers who want their coding agent to own the dev server, browser, and evidence stream while debugging a web application.

read the full dev3000 overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 212K vscode ★ 194K Langflow ★ 156K pi ★ 113K Supabase ★ 111K

Related comparisons

ecc vs react ecc vs langflow ecc vs supabase ecc vs puppeteer ecc vs nango ecc vs jitsu ecc vs aci-dev ecc vs convertigo ecc vs orbital openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

ECC vs react ECC vs Langflow ECC vs Supabase ECC vs puppeteer ECC vs archify ECC vs PocketBase ECC vs i-have-adhd ECC vs codebase-memory-mcp ECC vs herdr ECC vs ToolJet ECC vs AppSmith ECC vs it-tools

Frequently asked questions

Is ECC or dev3000 more popular?

ECC has 274,211 GitHub stars and dev3000 has 1,583. ECC has the larger community by that measure.

Are ECC and dev3000 free?

Both are open source. ECC is licensed under MIT and dev3000 under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ECC and dev3000?

ECC is written in JavaScript and dev3000 in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ECC or dev3000?

Choose ECC if you want the larger community (274,211 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose dev3000 if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.