head to head · open source

ECC vs config-file-validator

ECC has 273,125 GitHub stars, 40,766 forks, 345 open issues and last shipped today. config-file-validator has 515 stars, 117 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped today. ECC leads on adoption by 52,934% (273,125 vs 515 stars). ECC is written in JavaScript under MIT; config-file-validator is written in Go under Apache-2.0. ECC has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, config-file-validator 23%. ECC was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ECC ★ 273K config-file-validator ★ 515 category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ECC config-file-validator
GitHub stars ★ 273K ★ 515
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript Go
Last push 2026-10-05 2026-10-05
Forks ⑂ 41K ⑂ 117
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ECC if

  • You weight community size — 273K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ECC profile →

pick config-file-validator if

  • You want the config-file-validator feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and config-file-validator fits your workflow better

full config-file-validator profile →

About ECC

ECC is an MIT licensed open source agent harness performance optimization system that gives AI coding agents a coordinated engineering workflow — plan, test, implement, review, verify, remember, improve — for developers working in Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, and other harnesses.

read the full ECC overview →

About config-file-validator

cfv is a cross platform command line toolchain, written in Go, that validates syntax, schema compliance, and formatting across 18 configuration file types for developers and DevOps engineers.

read the full config-file-validator overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 212K vscode ★ 194K Langflow ★ 156K pi ★ 113K Supabase ★ 111K

Related comparisons

ecc vs react ecc vs langflow ecc vs supabase ecc vs puppeteer ecc vs nango ecc vs jitsu ecc vs aci-dev ecc vs convertigo ecc vs orbital openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

ECC vs react ECC vs Langflow ECC vs Supabase ECC vs puppeteer ECC vs archify ECC vs PocketBase ECC vs i-have-adhd ECC vs codebase-memory-mcp ECC vs herdr ECC vs ToolJet ECC vs AppSmith ECC vs it-tools

Frequently asked questions

Is ECC or config-file-validator more popular?

ECC has 273,125 GitHub stars and config-file-validator has 515. ECC has the larger community by that measure.

Are ECC and config-file-validator free?

Both are open source. ECC is licensed under MIT and config-file-validator under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ECC and config-file-validator?

ECC is written in JavaScript and config-file-validator in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ECC or config-file-validator?

Choose ECC if you want the larger community (273,125 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose config-file-validator if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.