head to head · open source

ECC vs Chartbrew

ECC has 263,046 GitHub stars, 39,368 forks, 204 open issues and last shipped today. Chartbrew has 4,061 stars, 455 forks, 5 open issues and last shipped today. ECC leads on adoption by 6,377% (263,046 vs 4,061 stars). ECC is written in JavaScript under MIT; Chartbrew is written in JavaScript under a custom or non-standard licence. ECC has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, Chartbrew 11%. Chartbrew was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ECC ★ 263K Chartbrew ★ 4.1K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ECC Chartbrew
GitHub stars ★ 263K ★ 4.1K
License MIT Custom / other
Written in JavaScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 39K ⑂ 455
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ECC if

  • You weight community size — 263K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ECC profile →

pick Chartbrew if

  • You want the Chartbrew feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and Chartbrew fits your workflow better

full Chartbrew profile →

About ECC

ECC is an MIT licensed open source agent harness performance optimization system that gives AI coding agents a coordinated engineering workflow — plan, test, implement, review, verify, remember, improve — for developers working in Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, and other harnesses.

read the full ECC overview →

About Chartbrew

Chartbrew is an open source web application for building and sharing live data dashboards. It sits in the JavaScript developer tools ecosystem and connects directly to APIs, SQL databases, and NoSQL databases so users can turn query results and request responses into charts. The project provides a chart builder, editable dashboards, embeddable charts, a query and request editor, team capabilities, scheduling, and an AI assistant.

read the full Chartbrew overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

ecc vs react ecc vs langflow ecc vs supabase ecc vs puppeteer ecc vs nango ecc vs jitsu ecc vs aci-dev ecc vs convertigo ecc vs orbital openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

ECC vs react ECC vs Langflow ECC vs Supabase ECC vs puppeteer ECC vs archify ECC vs PocketBase ECC vs i-have-adhd ECC vs codebase-memory-mcp ECC vs ToolJet ECC vs AppSmith ECC vs it-tools ECC vs herdr

Frequently asked questions

Is ECC or Chartbrew more popular?

ECC has 263,046 GitHub stars and Chartbrew has 4,061. ECC has the larger community by that measure.

Are ECC and Chartbrew free?

Both are open source. ECC is licensed under MIT, and Chartbrew has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between ECC and Chartbrew?

ECC is written in JavaScript and Chartbrew in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ECC or Chartbrew?

Choose ECC if you want the larger community (263,046 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Chartbrew if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.