head to head · open source

ECC vs buildwithclaude

ECC has 263,932 GitHub stars, 39,482 forks, 210 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. buildwithclaude has 3,503 stars, 519 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. ECC leads on adoption by 7,434% (263,932 vs 3,503 stars). ECC is written in JavaScript under MIT; buildwithclaude is written in Python under MIT. ECC has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, buildwithclaude 15%. ECC was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (claude, claude-code, mcp), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ECC ★ 264K buildwithclaude ★ 3.5K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ECC buildwithclaude
GitHub stars ★ 264K ★ 3.5K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript Python
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 39K ⑂ 519
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ECC if

  • You weight community size — 264K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ECC profile →

pick buildwithclaude if

  • You want the buildwithclaude feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and buildwithclaude fits your workflow better

full buildwithclaude profile →

About ECC

ECC is an MIT licensed open source agent harness performance optimization system that gives AI coding agents a coordinated engineering workflow — plan, test, implement, review, verify, remember, improve — for developers working in Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, and other harnesses.

read the full ECC overview →

About buildwithclaude

Build with Claude is an open source plugin marketplace and discovery platform that gathers Claude Skills, Agents, Commands, Hooks, Plugins, and Marketplace collections into a single searchable hub for people extending Claude Code, Claude Desktop, the Agent SDK, and OpenClaw.

read the full buildwithclaude overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 108K

Related comparisons

ecc vs react ecc vs langflow ecc vs supabase ecc vs puppeteer ecc vs nango ecc vs jitsu ecc vs aci-dev ecc vs convertigo ecc vs orbital openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

ECC vs react ECC vs Langflow ECC vs Supabase ECC vs puppeteer ECC vs archify ECC vs PocketBase ECC vs i-have-adhd ECC vs codebase-memory-mcp ECC vs ToolJet ECC vs AppSmith ECC vs it-tools ECC vs shellcheck

Frequently asked questions

Is ECC or buildwithclaude more popular?

ECC has 263,932 GitHub stars and buildwithclaude has 3,503. ECC has the larger community by that measure.

Are ECC and buildwithclaude free?

Both are open source. ECC is licensed under MIT and buildwithclaude under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ECC and buildwithclaude?

ECC is written in JavaScript and buildwithclaude in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ECC or buildwithclaude?

Choose ECC if you want the larger community (263,932 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose buildwithclaude if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.