head to head · open source

ECC vs Acode

ECC has 261,896 GitHub stars, 39,186 forks, 228 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Acode has 7,033 stars, 1,561 forks, 94 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ECC leads on adoption by 3,624% (261,896 vs 7,033 stars). ECC is written in JavaScript under MIT; Acode is written in JavaScript under MIT. ECC has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, Acode 22%. Acode was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ECC ★ 262K Acode ★ 7.0K category Developer Tools

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

ECC Acode
GitHub stars ★ 262K ★ 7.0K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 39K ⑂ 1.6K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ECC if

  • You weight community size — 262K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ECC profile →

pick Acode if

  • You want the Acode feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and Acode fits your workflow better

full Acode profile →

About ECC

ECC is an MIT licensed open source agent harness performance optimization system that gives AI coding agents a coordinated engineering workflow — plan, test, implement, review, verify, remember, improve — for developers working in Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, and other harnesses.

read the full ECC overview →

About Acode

Acode is a free, MIT licensed code editor for Android, distributed by the Acode Foundation under the package name com.foxdebug.acodefree on Google Play and com.foxdebug.acode on F Droid, and it is aimed at developers who want to read, edit, and preview source files directly on an Android phone or tablet.

read the full Acode overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 208K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow react vs pocketbase langflow vs langchain react vs tooljet react vs appsmith openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

ECC vs react ECC vs Langflow ECC vs Supabase ECC vs puppeteer ECC vs archify ECC vs PocketBase ECC vs ToolJet ECC vs AppSmith ECC vs it-tools ECC vs herdr ECC vs lapce ECC vs TipTap

Frequently asked questions

Is ECC or Acode more popular?

ECC has 261,896 GitHub stars and Acode has 7,033. ECC has the larger community by that measure.

Are ECC and Acode free?

Both are open source. ECC is licensed under MIT and Acode under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ECC and Acode?

ECC is written in JavaScript and Acode in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ECC or Acode?

Choose ECC if you want the larger community (261,896 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Acode if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.