head to head · open source

drawDB vs juicefs

drawDB has 39,590 GitHub stars, 3,253 forks, 241 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. juicefs has 14,440 stars, 1,290 forks, 203 open issues and last shipped today. drawDB leads on adoption by 174% (39,590 vs 14,440 stars). drawDB is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0; juicefs is written in Go under Apache-2.0. drawDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, juicefs 9%. juicefs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

drawDB ★ 40K juicefs ★ 14K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

drawDB juicefs
GitHub stars ★ 40K ★ 14K
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 3.3K ⑂ 1.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick drawDB if

  • You weight community size — 40K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full drawDB profile →

pick juicefs if

  • You want the juicefs feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and juicefs fits your workflow better

full juicefs profile →

About drawDB

drawDB is a free, open source, browser based database entity relationship diagram (ERD) editor and SQL generator for developers, data modellers, and teams who need to design database schemas and turn them into SQL scripts without creating an account.

read the full drawDB overview →

About juicefs

JuiceFS is a Go based, Apache 2.0 distributed POSIX file system that stores file data in object storage and metadata in a database engine such as Redis, MySQL, SQLite, or TiKV, and it is aimed at cloud native infrastructure, big data, machine learning, and AI workloads.

read the full juicefs overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

drawDB vs mall drawDB vs Prometheus drawDB vs NocoDB drawDB vs etcd drawDB vs DBeaver drawDB vs orm drawDB vs Milvus drawDB vs TiDB drawDB vs typeorm drawDB vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager drawDB vs Qdrant drawDB vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is drawDB or juicefs more popular?

drawDB has 39,590 GitHub stars and juicefs has 14,440. drawDB has the larger community by that measure.

Are drawDB and juicefs free?

Both are open source. drawDB is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and juicefs under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between drawDB and juicefs?

drawDB is written in JavaScript and juicefs in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, drawDB or juicefs?

Choose drawDB if you want the larger community (39,590 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose juicefs if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.