head to head · open source

drawDB vs typeorm

drawDB has 39,572 GitHub stars, 3,248 forks, 241 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. typeorm has 36,652 stars, 6,670 forks, 646 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. drawDB leads on adoption by 8% (39,572 vs 36,652 stars). drawDB is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0; typeorm is written in TypeScript under MIT. drawDB has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, typeorm 18%. drawDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (database, mariadb), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

drawDB ★ 40K typeorm ★ 37K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

drawDB typeorm
GitHub stars ★ 40K ★ 37K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-13 2026-09-11
Forks ⑂ 3.2K ⑂ 6.7K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick drawDB if

  • You weight community size — 40K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full drawDB profile →

pick typeorm if

  • You want the typeorm feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and typeorm fits your workflow better

full typeorm profile →

About drawDB

drawDB is a free, open source, browser based database entity relationship diagram (ERD) editor and SQL generator for developers, data modellers, and teams who need to design database schemas and turn them into SQL scripts without creating an account.

read the full drawDB overview →

About typeorm

TypeORM is an MIT licensed object relational mapper for TypeScript and JavaScript that runs on Node.js, in the browser, and across mobile and desktop platforms, and it is aimed at developers who want to model, query, and migrate SQL and NoSQL databases from one decorator driven codebase.

read the full typeorm overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

drawDB vs mall drawDB vs Prometheus drawDB vs NocoDB drawDB vs etcd drawDB vs DBeaver drawDB vs orm drawDB vs Milvus drawDB vs TiDB drawDB vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager drawDB vs Qdrant drawDB vs rocksdb drawDB vs InfluxDB

Frequently asked questions

Is drawDB or typeorm more popular?

drawDB has 39,572 GitHub stars and typeorm has 36,652. drawDB has the larger community by that measure.

Are drawDB and typeorm free?

Both are open source. drawDB is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and typeorm under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between drawDB and typeorm?

drawDB is written in JavaScript and typeorm in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, drawDB or typeorm?

Choose drawDB if you want the larger community (39,572 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose typeorm if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.