head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs doris
Uptime Kuma has 91,477 GitHub stars, 8,426 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. doris has 15,945 stars, 3,949 forks, 1,320 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 474% (91,477 vs 15,945 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; doris is written in Java under Apache-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, doris 25%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | doris | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 91K | ★ 16K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Java |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 3.9K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick doris if
- You want the doris feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You evaluated both and doris fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About doris
Apache Doris is an open source, real time analytics and search database built on a massively parallel processing (MPP) architecture. It runs on the JVM and is written in Java, licensed under Apache 2.0, and has been developed in the open for roughly nine years, with the repository showing about 15,900 stars and 3,900 forks. It lives in the data infrastructure ecosystem, where it sits alongside streaming systems, lakehouse table formats, and business intelligence tooling rather than replacing any single one of them. The project describes itself as a real time analytics and hybrid search database for AI agents.…
read the full doris overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or doris more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 91,477 GitHub stars and doris has 15,945. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and doris free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and doris under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and doris?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and doris in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or doris?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,477 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose doris if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.