head to head · open source

compose vs donutbrowser

compose has 38,195 GitHub stars, 5,825 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. donutbrowser has 3,861 stars, 410 forks, 28 open issues and last shipped yesterday. compose leads on adoption by 889% (38,195 vs 3,861 stars). compose is written in Go under Apache-2.0; donutbrowser is written in Rust under AGPL-3.0. compose has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, donutbrowser 11%. donutbrowser was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (orchestration), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

compose ★ 38K donutbrowser ★ 3.9K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

compose donutbrowser
GitHub stars ★ 38K ★ 3.9K
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Go Rust
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 5.8K ⑂ 410
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick compose if

  • You weight community size — 38K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full compose profile →

pick donutbrowser if

  • You want the donutbrowser feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and donutbrowser fits your workflow better

full donutbrowser profile →

About compose

Docker Compose is an Apache 2.0 licensed Go tool that defines and runs multi container applications on Docker from a single Compose file, aimed at developers and operators who need several containers to start together as one isolated application.

read the full compose overview →

About donutbrowser

Donut Browser is a free, open source anti detect browser written in Rust for anyone who needs many fully isolated browser identities — each with its own fingerprint, cookies, extensions, proxy, and VPN — running from one desktop install, and for the automation engineers and teams who script or sync those profiles.

read the full donutbrowser overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

ansible vs compose n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

compose vs ansible compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks compose vs Kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher compose vs Prefect compose vs Archon compose vs Temporal compose vs rowboat compose vs Trigger

Frequently asked questions

Is compose or donutbrowser more popular?

compose has 38,195 GitHub stars and donutbrowser has 3,861. compose has the larger community by that measure.

Are compose and donutbrowser free?

Both are open source. compose is licensed under Apache-2.0 and donutbrowser under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between compose and donutbrowser?

compose is written in Go and donutbrowser in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, compose or donutbrowser?

Choose compose if you want the larger community (38,195 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose donutbrowser if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.