head to head · open source

DeskcommCRM vs bytedesk

DeskcommCRM has 4,314 GitHub stars, 1,090 forks, 105 open issues and last shipped today. bytedesk has 500 stars, 141 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. DeskcommCRM leads on adoption by 763% (4,314 vs 500 stars). DeskcommCRM is written in TypeScript under MIT; bytedesk is written in Java under AGPL-3.0. DeskcommCRM has attracted 25% as many forks as stars, bytedesk 28%. DeskcommCRM was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (ai, chatbot, customer-support), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

DeskcommCRM ★ 4.3K bytedesk ★ 500 category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

DeskcommCRM bytedesk
GitHub stars ★ 4.3K ★ 500
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Java
Last push 2026-10-01 2026-09-30
Forks ⑂ 1.1K ⑂ 141
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick DeskcommCRM if

  • You weight community size — 4.3K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full DeskcommCRM profile →

pick bytedesk if

  • You want the bytedesk feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and bytedesk fits your workflow better

full bytedesk profile →

About DeskcommCRM

DeskcommCRM is an open source AI sales OS. It is a self hosted CRM with native AI agents and WhatsApp support through WAHA. It lives in the Business Software / Customer Support & Success ecosystem. The project targets businesses that sell by chat. It is presented as an open alternative to Kommo, Octadesk, and Intercom.

read the full DeskcommCRM overview →

About bytedesk

Bytedesk is an open source, AI powered omnichannel customer service and team messaging platform written in Java, aimed at organizations that want to self host their own live chat, ticketing, and internal IM stack.

read the full bytedesk overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 58K Odoo ★ 55K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

chatwoot vs deskcommcrm chatwoot vs botpress chatwoot vs glpi chatwoot vs zammad chatwoot vs chaskiq chatwoot vs frappe-helpdesk chatwoot vs libredesk chatwoot vs goflylivechat opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip

More Customer Support & Success projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Customer Support & Success field.

DeskcommCRM vs Chatwoot DeskcommCRM vs glpi DeskcommCRM vs Zammad DeskcommCRM vs Chaskiq DeskcommCRM vs Frappe Helpdesk DeskcommCRM vs libredesk DeskcommCRM vs goflylivechat DeskcommCRM vs Usertour DeskcommCRM vs TikTokLive DeskcommCRM vs iTop DeskcommCRM vs rt DeskcommCRM vs chatwoot-mobile-app

Frequently asked questions

Is DeskcommCRM or bytedesk more popular?

DeskcommCRM has 4,314 GitHub stars and bytedesk has 500. DeskcommCRM has the larger community by that measure.

Are DeskcommCRM and bytedesk free?

Both are open source. DeskcommCRM is licensed under MIT and bytedesk under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between DeskcommCRM and bytedesk?

DeskcommCRM is written in TypeScript and bytedesk in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, DeskcommCRM or bytedesk?

Choose DeskcommCRM if you want the larger community (4,314 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose bytedesk if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.