head to head · open source

DBeaver vs rxdb

DBeaver has 51,791 GitHub stars, 4,371 forks, 3,334 open issues and last shipped yesterday. rxdb has 23,384 stars, 1,176 forks, 17 open issues and last shipped yesterday. DBeaver leads on adoption by 121% (51,791 vs 23,384 stars). DBeaver is written in Java under Apache-2.0; rxdb is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. DBeaver has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, rxdb 5%. DBeaver was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (database), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

DBeaver ★ 52K rxdb ★ 23K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

DBeaver rxdb
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 23K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Java TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 4.4K ⑂ 1.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick DBeaver if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full DBeaver profile →

pick rxdb if

  • You want the rxdb feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and rxdb fits your workflow better

full rxdb profile →

About DBeaver

DBeaver is a free, multi platform database management tool built in Java, designed for developers, SQL programmers, database administrators, and analysts. It operates across Windows, macOS, and Linux and integrates with the Eclipse based plugin ecosystem via OSGi and Eclipse RCP frameworks.

read the full DBeaver overview →

About rxdb

RxDB is a local first, reactive NoSQL database for JavaScript applications, aimed at developers building offline capable or realtime user interfaces who want client side data storage and sync through their own backend rather than a hosted vendor.

read the full rxdb overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs dbeaver mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

DBeaver vs mall DBeaver vs Prometheus DBeaver vs NocoDB DBeaver vs etcd DBeaver vs orm DBeaver vs Milvus DBeaver vs TiDB DBeaver vs drawDB DBeaver vs typeorm DBeaver vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager DBeaver vs Qdrant DBeaver vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is DBeaver or rxdb more popular?

DBeaver has 51,791 GitHub stars and rxdb has 23,384. DBeaver has the larger community by that measure.

Are DBeaver and rxdb free?

Both are open source. DBeaver is licensed under Apache-2.0 and rxdb under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between DBeaver and rxdb?

DBeaver is written in Java and rxdb in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, DBeaver or rxdb?

Choose DBeaver if you want the larger community (51,791 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose rxdb if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.