head to head · open source

DBeaver vs risingwave

DBeaver has 51,797 GitHub stars, 4,372 forks, 3,334 open issues and last shipped today. risingwave has 9,330 stars, 838 forks, 1,687 open issues and last shipped today. DBeaver leads on adoption by 455% (51,797 vs 9,330 stars). DBeaver is written in Java under Apache-2.0; risingwave is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. DBeaver has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, risingwave 9%. risingwave was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (database), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

DBeaver ★ 52K risingwave ★ 9.3K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

DBeaver risingwave
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 9.3K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Java Rust
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 4.4K ⑂ 838
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick DBeaver if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full DBeaver profile →

pick risingwave if

  • You want the risingwave feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and risingwave fits your workflow better

full risingwave profile →

About DBeaver

DBeaver is a free, multi platform database management tool built in Java, designed for developers, SQL programmers, database administrators, and analysts. It operates across Windows, macOS, and Linux and integrates with the Eclipse based plugin ecosystem via OSGi and Eclipse RCP frameworks.

read the full DBeaver overview →

About risingwave

RisingWave is an Apache 2.0, Rust written event streaming platform for agentic AI that continuously ingests data from databases, event streams and webhooks, processes it incrementally, and serves fresh results at low latency, and it is aimed at teams building agents, real time applications and streaming data pipelines that need always current, queryable data.

read the full risingwave overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs dbeaver mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

DBeaver vs mall DBeaver vs Prometheus DBeaver vs NocoDB DBeaver vs etcd DBeaver vs orm DBeaver vs Milvus DBeaver vs TiDB DBeaver vs drawDB DBeaver vs typeorm DBeaver vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager DBeaver vs Qdrant DBeaver vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is DBeaver or risingwave more popular?

DBeaver has 51,797 GitHub stars and risingwave has 9,330. DBeaver has the larger community by that measure.

Are DBeaver and risingwave free?

Both are open source. DBeaver is licensed under Apache-2.0 and risingwave under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between DBeaver and risingwave?

DBeaver is written in Java and risingwave in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, DBeaver or risingwave?

Choose DBeaver if you want the larger community (51,797 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose risingwave if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.