head to head · open source

DBeaver vs oxigraph

DBeaver has 51,791 GitHub stars, 4,371 forks, 3,334 open issues and last shipped yesterday. oxigraph has 1,912 stars, 173 forks, 149 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. DBeaver leads on adoption by 2,609% (51,791 vs 1,912 stars). DBeaver is written in Java under Apache-2.0; oxigraph is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. DBeaver has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, oxigraph 9%. DBeaver was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

DBeaver ★ 52K oxigraph ★ 1.9K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

DBeaver oxigraph
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 1.9K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Java Rust
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-15
Forks ⑂ 4.4K ⑂ 173
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick DBeaver if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full DBeaver profile →

pick oxigraph if

  • You want the oxigraph feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and oxigraph fits your workflow better

full oxigraph profile →

About DBeaver

DBeaver is a free, multi platform database management tool built in Java, designed for developers, SQL programmers, database administrators, and analysts. It operates across Windows, macOS, and Linux and integrates with the Eclipse based plugin ecosystem via OSGi and Eclipse RCP frameworks.

read the full DBeaver overview →

About oxigraph

Oxigraph is an open source graph database and an RDF and SPARQL toolkit. It is written in Rust, released under the Apache 2.0 license, and lives in the RDF and SPARQL ecosystem. Its stated goal is to provide a compliant, safe, and fast graph database based on the RocksDB key value store, while also offering utilities for basic RDF manipulation and for building SPARQL implementations.

read the full oxigraph overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs dbeaver mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

DBeaver vs mall DBeaver vs Prometheus DBeaver vs NocoDB DBeaver vs etcd DBeaver vs orm DBeaver vs Milvus DBeaver vs TiDB DBeaver vs drawDB DBeaver vs typeorm DBeaver vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager DBeaver vs Qdrant DBeaver vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is DBeaver or oxigraph more popular?

DBeaver has 51,791 GitHub stars and oxigraph has 1,912. DBeaver has the larger community by that measure.

Are DBeaver and oxigraph free?

Both are open source. DBeaver is licensed under Apache-2.0 and oxigraph under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between DBeaver and oxigraph?

DBeaver is written in Java and oxigraph in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, DBeaver or oxigraph?

Choose DBeaver if you want the larger community (51,791 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose oxigraph if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.