head to head · open source

DBeaver vs Memgraph

DBeaver has 51,791 GitHub stars, 4,371 forks, 3,334 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Memgraph has 4,566 stars, 283 forks, 813 open issues and last shipped yesterday. DBeaver leads on adoption by 1,034% (51,791 vs 4,566 stars). DBeaver is written in Java under Apache-2.0; Memgraph is written in C++ under a custom or non-standard licence. DBeaver has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, Memgraph 6%. Memgraph was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

DBeaver ★ 52K Memgraph ★ 4.6K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

DBeaver Memgraph
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 4.6K
License Apache-2.0 Custom / other
Written in Java C++
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 4.4K ⑂ 283
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick DBeaver if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full DBeaver profile →

pick Memgraph if

  • You want the Memgraph feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and Memgraph fits your workflow better

full Memgraph profile →

About DBeaver

DBeaver is a free, multi platform database management tool built in Java, designed for developers, SQL programmers, database administrators, and analysts. It operates across Windows, macOS, and Linux and integrates with the Eclipse based plugin ecosystem via OSGi and Eclipse RCP frameworks.

read the full DBeaver overview →

About Memgraph

Memgraph is an open source, in memory graph database written in C and C++ for real time graph analytics, GraphRAG, AI memory, and agentic workflows. It is ACID compliant and highly available. It lives in the graph database and AI infrastructure ecosystem and uses a Cypher compatible query layer familiar from Neo4j environments.

read the full Memgraph overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs dbeaver mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

DBeaver vs mall DBeaver vs Prometheus DBeaver vs NocoDB DBeaver vs etcd DBeaver vs orm DBeaver vs Milvus DBeaver vs TiDB DBeaver vs drawDB DBeaver vs typeorm DBeaver vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager DBeaver vs Qdrant DBeaver vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is DBeaver or Memgraph more popular?

DBeaver has 51,791 GitHub stars and Memgraph has 4,566. DBeaver has the larger community by that measure.

Are DBeaver and Memgraph free?

Both are open source. DBeaver is licensed under Apache-2.0, and Memgraph has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between DBeaver and Memgraph?

DBeaver is written in Java and Memgraph in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, DBeaver or Memgraph?

Choose DBeaver if you want the larger community (51,791 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Memgraph if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.