head to head · open source

DBeaver vs infrahub

DBeaver has 51,797 GitHub stars, 4,372 forks, 3,334 open issues and last shipped today. infrahub has 519 stars, 59 forks, 552 open issues and last shipped today. DBeaver leads on adoption by 9,880% (51,797 vs 519 stars). DBeaver is written in Java under Apache-2.0; infrahub is written in Python under Apache-2.0. DBeaver has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, infrahub 11%. DBeaver was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

DBeaver ★ 52K infrahub ★ 519 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

DBeaver infrahub
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 519
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Java Python
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 4.4K ⑂ 59
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick DBeaver if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full DBeaver profile →

pick infrahub if

  • You want the infrahub feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and infrahub fits your workflow better

full infrahub profile →

About DBeaver

DBeaver is a free, multi platform database management tool built in Java, designed for developers, SQL programmers, database administrators, and analysts. It operates across Windows, macOS, and Linux and integrates with the Eclipse based plugin ecosystem via OSGi and Eclipse RCP frameworks.

read the full DBeaver overview →

About infrahub

The data foundation for modern automation Infrahub Community Infrahub Enterprise Sandbox Infrahub is the data foundation for modern infrastructure automation, for teams managing networks, data centers, and cloud infrastructure. It moves them from fragmented data and one off scripts to repeatable, validated workflows — delivering infrastructure as a reliable service to the rest of the business and the AI agents that consume it. Key capabilities Schema first, graph backed data model. Define your own data models for devices, services, topologies, and business context — enforced with validation and queried with first…

read the full infrahub overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs dbeaver mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

DBeaver vs mall DBeaver vs Prometheus DBeaver vs NocoDB DBeaver vs etcd DBeaver vs orm DBeaver vs Milvus DBeaver vs TiDB DBeaver vs drawDB DBeaver vs typeorm DBeaver vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager DBeaver vs Qdrant DBeaver vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is DBeaver or infrahub more popular?

DBeaver has 51,797 GitHub stars and infrahub has 519. DBeaver has the larger community by that measure.

Are DBeaver and infrahub free?

Both are open source. DBeaver is licensed under Apache-2.0 and infrahub under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between DBeaver and infrahub?

DBeaver is written in Java and infrahub in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, DBeaver or infrahub?

Choose DBeaver if you want the larger community (51,797 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose infrahub if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.