head to head · open source

DBeaver vs graphqlite

DBeaver has 51,930 GitHub stars, 4,389 forks, 3,334 open issues and last shipped yesterday. graphqlite has 501 stars, 29 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 24 days ago. DBeaver leads on adoption by 10,265% (51,930 vs 501 stars). DBeaver is written in Java under Apache-2.0; graphqlite is written in C under MIT. DBeaver has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, graphqlite 6%. DBeaver was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

DBeaver ★ 52K graphqlite ★ 501 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

DBeaver graphqlite
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 501
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Java C
Last push 2026-09-30 2026-09-07
Forks ⑂ 4.4K ⑂ 29
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick DBeaver if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full DBeaver profile →

pick graphqlite if

  • You want the graphqlite feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and graphqlite fits your workflow better

full graphqlite profile →

About DBeaver

DBeaver is a free, multi platform database management tool built in Java, designed for developers, SQL programmers, database administrators, and analysts. It operates across Windows, macOS, and Linux and integrates with the Eclipse based plugin ecosystem via OSGi and Eclipse RCP frameworks.

read the full DBeaver overview →

About graphqlite

GraphQLite is an MIT licensed SQLite extension, written in C, that adds graph database capabilities to SQLite through the Cypher query language and built in graph algorithms, and it is aimed at developers and data teams who want to store and query connected data inside an ordinary SQLite database rather than operating a separate graph server.

read the full graphqlite overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 88K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

mall vs dbeaver supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

DBeaver vs mall DBeaver vs Prometheus DBeaver vs NocoDB DBeaver vs etcd DBeaver vs orm DBeaver vs Milvus DBeaver vs TiDB DBeaver vs drawDB DBeaver vs typeorm DBeaver vs Qdrant DBeaver vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager DBeaver vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is DBeaver or graphqlite more popular?

DBeaver has 51,930 GitHub stars and graphqlite has 501. DBeaver has the larger community by that measure.

Are DBeaver and graphqlite free?

Both are open source. DBeaver is licensed under Apache-2.0 and graphqlite under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between DBeaver and graphqlite?

DBeaver is written in Java and graphqlite in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, DBeaver or graphqlite?

Choose DBeaver if you want the larger community (51,930 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose graphqlite if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.