head to head · open source

DBeaver vs centrifugo

DBeaver has 51,797 GitHub stars, 4,372 forks, 3,334 open issues and last shipped today. centrifugo has 10,762 stars, 733 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. DBeaver leads on adoption by 381% (51,797 vs 10,762 stars). DBeaver is written in Java under Apache-2.0; centrifugo is written in Go under Apache-2.0. DBeaver has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, centrifugo 7%. DBeaver was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

DBeaver ★ 52K centrifugo ★ 11K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

DBeaver centrifugo
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 11K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Java Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 4.4K ⑂ 733
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick DBeaver if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full DBeaver profile →

pick centrifugo if

  • You want the centrifugo feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and centrifugo fits your workflow better

full centrifugo profile →

About DBeaver

DBeaver is a free, multi platform database management tool built in Java, designed for developers, SQL programmers, database administrators, and analysts. It operates across Windows, macOS, and Linux and integrates with the Eclipse based plugin ecosystem via OSGi and Eclipse RCP frameworks.

read the full DBeaver overview →

About centrifugo

Centrifugo is an open source, language agnostic real time messaging server that delivers messages to online users over WebSocket, HTTP streaming, Server Sent Events, GRPC, and WebTransport, and it is built for teams that want user facing PUB/SUB without writing and operating the transport layer themselves.

read the full centrifugo overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs dbeaver mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

DBeaver vs mall DBeaver vs Prometheus DBeaver vs NocoDB DBeaver vs etcd DBeaver vs orm DBeaver vs Milvus DBeaver vs TiDB DBeaver vs drawDB DBeaver vs typeorm DBeaver vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager DBeaver vs Qdrant DBeaver vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is DBeaver or centrifugo more popular?

DBeaver has 51,797 GitHub stars and centrifugo has 10,762. DBeaver has the larger community by that measure.

Are DBeaver and centrifugo free?

Both are open source. DBeaver is licensed under Apache-2.0 and centrifugo under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between DBeaver and centrifugo?

DBeaver is written in Java and centrifugo in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, DBeaver or centrifugo?

Choose DBeaver if you want the larger community (51,797 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose centrifugo if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.