head to head · open source

DBeaver vs Bytebase

DBeaver has 51,791 GitHub stars, 4,371 forks, 3,334 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Bytebase has 14,491 stars, 983 forks, 167 open issues and last shipped yesterday. DBeaver leads on adoption by 257% (51,791 vs 14,491 stars). DBeaver is written in Java under Apache-2.0; Bytebase is written in Go under a custom or non-standard licence. DBeaver has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, Bytebase 7%. Bytebase was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

DBeaver ★ 52K Bytebase ★ 14K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

DBeaver Bytebase
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 14K
License Apache-2.0 Custom / other
Written in Java Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 4.4K ⑂ 983
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick DBeaver if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full DBeaver profile →

pick Bytebase if

  • You want the Bytebase feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and Bytebase fits your workflow better

full Bytebase profile →

About DBeaver

DBeaver is a free, multi platform database management tool built in Java, designed for developers, SQL programmers, database administrators, and analysts. It operates across Windows, macOS, and Linux and integrates with the Eclipse based plugin ecosystem via OSGi and Eclipse RCP frameworks.

read the full DBeaver overview →

About Bytebase

Bytebase is an open source database governance platform that acts as a single control plane between human users, AI agents, and databases. It governs change management, access control, and compliance so that every database change and query can be reviewed, controlled, and recorded. The project sits in the Infrastructure and Operations database ecosystem, with topics that include CI/CD, DevOps, DevSecOps, GitOps, data governance, data masking, data security, database access, Flyway, Liquibase, and MongoDB.

read the full Bytebase overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs dbeaver mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

DBeaver vs mall DBeaver vs Prometheus DBeaver vs NocoDB DBeaver vs etcd DBeaver vs orm DBeaver vs Milvus DBeaver vs TiDB DBeaver vs drawDB DBeaver vs typeorm DBeaver vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager DBeaver vs Qdrant DBeaver vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is DBeaver or Bytebase more popular?

DBeaver has 51,791 GitHub stars and Bytebase has 14,491. DBeaver has the larger community by that measure.

Are DBeaver and Bytebase free?

Both are open source. DBeaver is licensed under Apache-2.0, and Bytebase has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between DBeaver and Bytebase?

DBeaver is written in Java and Bytebase in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, DBeaver or Bytebase?

Choose DBeaver if you want the larger community (51,791 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Bytebase if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.