head to head · open source

DBeaver vs autobase

DBeaver has 51,797 GitHub stars, 4,372 forks, 3,334 open issues and last shipped yesterday. autobase has 4,385 stars, 603 forks, 29 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. DBeaver leads on adoption by 1,081% (51,797 vs 4,385 stars). DBeaver is written in Java under Apache-2.0; autobase is written in TypeScript under MIT. DBeaver has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, autobase 14%. DBeaver was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (database), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

DBeaver ★ 52K autobase ★ 4.4K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

DBeaver autobase
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 4.4K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Java TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 4.4K ⑂ 603
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick DBeaver if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full DBeaver profile →

pick autobase if

  • You want the autobase feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and autobase fits your workflow better

full autobase profile →

About DBeaver

DBeaver is a free, multi platform database management tool built in Java, designed for developers, SQL programmers, database administrators, and analysts. It operates across Windows, macOS, and Linux and integrates with the Eclipse based plugin ecosystem via OSGi and Eclipse RCP frameworks.

read the full DBeaver overview →

About autobase

Autobase is an open source internal database platform for PostgreSQL that brings the managed DBaaS experience — deployment, failover, backups, restore, upgrades, and scaling — into infrastructure a team already owns, and it is aimed at teams running their own PostgreSQL that do not have dedicated database specialists.

read the full autobase overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs dbeaver supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack llama-index vs haystack compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job langgraph vs haystack compose vs gitleaks trivy vs gitleaks

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

DBeaver vs mall DBeaver vs Prometheus DBeaver vs NocoDB DBeaver vs etcd DBeaver vs orm DBeaver vs Milvus DBeaver vs TiDB DBeaver vs drawDB DBeaver vs typeorm DBeaver vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager DBeaver vs Qdrant DBeaver vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is DBeaver or autobase more popular?

DBeaver has 51,797 GitHub stars and autobase has 4,385. DBeaver has the larger community by that measure.

Are DBeaver and autobase free?

Both are open source. DBeaver is licensed under Apache-2.0 and autobase under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between DBeaver and autobase?

DBeaver is written in Java and autobase in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, DBeaver or autobase?

Choose DBeaver if you want the larger community (51,797 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose autobase if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.