head to head · open source

dagger vs webhook

dagger has 16,261 GitHub stars, 924 forks, 156 open issues and last shipped yesterday. webhook has 12,134 stars, 875 forks, 127 open issues and last shipped 14 days ago. dagger leads on adoption by 34% (16,261 vs 12,134 stars). dagger is written in Go under Apache-2.0; webhook is written in Go under MIT. dagger has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, webhook 7%. dagger was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (devops), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

dagger ★ 16K webhook ★ 12K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

dagger webhook
GitHub stars ★ 16K ★ 12K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-04
Forks ⑂ 924 ⑂ 875
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick dagger if

  • You weight community size — 16K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full dagger profile →

pick webhook if

  • You want the webhook feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and webhook fits your workflow better

full webhook profile →

About dagger

Dagger is an open source automation engine for software delivery, written in Go and released under the Apache 2.0 license. It builds, tests and ships any codebase, and it runs locally, inside a CI server, or directly in the cloud. The project lives in the cloud infrastructure and CI/CD ecosystem, where it occupies the space normally filled by shell scripts and proprietary pipeline YAML. It has been developed for roughly seven years and carries a substantial community footprint, with more than sixteen thousand stars and over nine hundred forks on GitHub.

read the full dagger overview →

About webhook

webhook is a lightweight, MIT licensed incoming webhook server written in Go that exposes HTTP endpoints which execute configured shell commands, built for developers and operators who want a push from GitHub, Bitbucket, Slack, or Mattermost to run a deploy or maintenance script on their own server.

read the full webhook overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

kong vs trivy kong vs opentofu kong vs jenkins kong vs pulumi kong vs floci kong vs argo-cd trivy vs opentofu kong vs sops uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.

dagger vs kong dagger vs trivy dagger vs OpenTofu dagger vs jenkins dagger vs Pulumi dagger vs floci dagger vs argo-cd dagger vs sops dagger vs wtf dagger vs task dagger vs aws-cdk dagger vs infracost

Frequently asked questions

Is dagger or webhook more popular?

dagger has 16,261 GitHub stars and webhook has 12,134. dagger has the larger community by that measure.

Are dagger and webhook free?

Both are open source. dagger is licensed under Apache-2.0 and webhook under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between dagger and webhook?

dagger is written in Go and webhook in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, dagger or webhook?

Choose dagger if you want the larger community (16,261 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose webhook if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.