head to head · open source
copyparty vs cyberduck
copyparty has 46,739 GitHub stars, 1,905 forks, 252 open issues and last shipped yesterday. cyberduck has 4,788 stars, 369 forks, 506 open issues and last shipped yesterday. copyparty leads on adoption by 876% (46,739 vs 4,788 stars). copyparty is written in Python under MIT; cyberduck is written in Java under GPL-3.0. copyparty has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, cyberduck 8%. copyparty was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| copyparty | cyberduck | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 47K | ★ 4.8K |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | Java |
| Last push | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.9K | ⑂ 369 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick copyparty if
- You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick cyberduck if
- You want the cyberduck feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You evaluated both and cyberduck fits your workflow better
About copyparty
copyparty is a portable file server that turns almost any device into a file server with resumable uploads and downloads through any web browser, built for self hosters, homelab operators, NAS owners and anyone who wants to share files directly from their own hardware.
read the full copyparty overview →
About cyberduck
Cyberduck is a libre FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, Amazon S3, Backblaze B2, Microsoft Azure & OneDrive and OpenStack Swift file transfer client for macOS and Windows, released under the GNU General Public License version 3 and developed at the iterate ch/cyberduck repository.
read the full cyberduck overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More File Management & Sync projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.
Frequently asked questions
Is copyparty or cyberduck more popular?
copyparty has 46,739 GitHub stars and cyberduck has 4,788. copyparty has the larger community by that measure.
Are copyparty and cyberduck free?
Both are open source. copyparty is licensed under MIT and cyberduck under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between copyparty and cyberduck?
copyparty is written in Python and cyberduck in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, copyparty or cyberduck?
Choose copyparty if you want the larger community (46,739 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose cyberduck if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.