head to head · open source
copyparty vs cryfs
copyparty has 46,739 GitHub stars, 1,905 forks, 252 open issues and last shipped yesterday. cryfs has 2,304 stars, 170 forks, 154 open issues and last shipped yesterday. copyparty leads on adoption by 1,929% (46,739 vs 2,304 stars). copyparty is written in Python under MIT; cryfs is written in Rust under LGPL-3.0. copyparty has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, cryfs 7%. copyparty was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| copyparty | cryfs | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 47K | ★ 2.3K |
| License | MIT | LGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.9K | ⑂ 170 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick copyparty if
- You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick cryfs if
- You want the cryfs feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the LGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and cryfs fits your workflow better
About copyparty
copyparty is a portable file server that turns almost any device into a file server with resumable uploads and downloads through any web browser, built for self hosters, homelab operators, NAS owners and anyone who wants to share files directly from their own hardware.
read the full copyparty overview →
About cryfs
CryFS is a FUSE based cryptographic filesystem written in Rust that encrypts a vault directory so it can be stored safely in cloud services such as Dropbox, iCloud, or OneDrive, and it is intended for Linux users who want their file contents, file sizes, directory structure, and metadata hidden from the storage provider rather than encrypted one file at a time.
read the full cryfs overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More File Management & Sync projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.
Frequently asked questions
Is copyparty or cryfs more popular?
copyparty has 46,739 GitHub stars and cryfs has 2,304. copyparty has the larger community by that measure.
Are copyparty and cryfs free?
Both are open source. copyparty is licensed under MIT and cryfs under LGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between copyparty and cryfs?
copyparty is written in Python and cryfs in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, copyparty or cryfs?
Choose copyparty if you want the larger community (46,739 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose cryfs if its feature set, stack or LGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.