head to head · open source

copyparty vs zrok

copyparty has 46,739 GitHub stars, 1,905 forks, 252 open issues and last shipped yesterday. zrok has 4,711 stars, 224 forks, 125 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. copyparty leads on adoption by 892% (46,739 vs 4,711 stars). copyparty is written in Python under MIT; zrok is written in Go under Apache-2.0. copyparty has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, zrok 5%. copyparty was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (file-sharing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

copyparty ★ 47K zrok ★ 4.7K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

copyparty zrok
GitHub stars ★ 47K ★ 4.7K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Python Go
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-06-22
Forks ⑂ 1.9K ⑂ 224
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick copyparty if

  • You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full copyparty profile →

pick zrok if

  • You want the zrok feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and zrok fits your workflow better

full zrok profile →

About copyparty

copyparty is a portable file server that turns almost any device into a file server with resumable uploads and downloads through any web browser, built for self hosters, homelab operators, NAS owners and anyone who wants to share files directly from their own hardware.

read the full copyparty overview →

About zrok

zrok is an open source, Apache 2.0 licensed secure sharing tool written in Go that lets developers, operators, and self hosters expose web services, folders, and TCP or UDP resources over the internet or to specific users without firewall changes or port forwarding.

read the full zrok overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs seafile localsend vs pairdrop localsend vs opencloud localsend vs owncloud localsend vs sync-in localsend vs hoodik openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

copyparty vs LocalSend copyparty vs rclone copyparty vs Files copyparty vs yazi copyparty vs Spacedrive copyparty vs Nextcloud copyparty vs uppy copyparty vs cloudreve copyparty vs superfile copyparty vs ranger copyparty vs Seafile copyparty vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is copyparty or zrok more popular?

copyparty has 46,739 GitHub stars and zrok has 4,711. copyparty has the larger community by that measure.

Are copyparty and zrok free?

Both are open source. copyparty is licensed under MIT and zrok under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between copyparty and zrok?

copyparty is written in Python and zrok in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, copyparty or zrok?

Choose copyparty if you want the larger community (46,739 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose zrok if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.