head to head · open source
copyparty vs zipline
copyparty has 46,774 GitHub stars, 1,905 forks, 252 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. zipline has 3,430 stars, 256 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. copyparty leads on adoption by 1,264% (46,774 vs 3,430 stars). copyparty is written in Python under MIT; zipline is written in TypeScript under MIT. copyparty has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, zipline 7%. copyparty was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (file-server, file-sharing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| copyparty | zipline | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 47K | ★ 3.4K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-20 | 2026-09-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.9K | ⑂ 256 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick copyparty if
- You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick zipline if
- You want the zipline feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and zipline fits your workflow better
About copyparty
copyparty is a portable file server that turns almost any device into a file server with resumable uploads and downloads through any web browser, built for self hosters, homelab operators, NAS owners and anyone who wants to share files directly from their own hardware.
read the full copyparty overview →
About zipline
Zipline is a self hosted ShareX and general file upload server, written in TypeScript and released under the MIT licence, for individuals and teams who want their own destination for screenshots, files and shortened links instead of uploading to somebody else's service.
read the full zipline overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More File Management & Sync projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.
Frequently asked questions
Is copyparty or zipline more popular?
copyparty has 46,774 GitHub stars and zipline has 3,430. copyparty has the larger community by that measure.
Are copyparty and zipline free?
Both are open source. copyparty is licensed under MIT and zipline under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between copyparty and zipline?
copyparty is written in Python and zipline in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, copyparty or zipline?
Choose copyparty if you want the larger community (46,774 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose zipline if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.