head to head · open source
copyparty vs xplr
copyparty has 47,277 GitHub stars, 1,921 forks, 252 open issues and last shipped 19 days ago. xplr has 4,851 stars, 97 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped 14 days ago. copyparty leads on adoption by 875% (47,277 vs 4,851 stars). copyparty is written in Python under MIT; xplr is written in Rust under MIT. copyparty has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, xplr 2%. xplr was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| copyparty | xplr | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 47K | ★ 4.9K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-10-21 | 2026-10-26 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.9K | ⑂ 97 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick copyparty if
- You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick xplr if
- You want the xplr feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and xplr fits your workflow better
About copyparty
💾🎉 copyparty turn almost any device into a file server with resumable uploads/downloads using any web browser server only needs Python (2 or 3), all dependencies optional 🔌 protocols: http(s) // webdav // sftp // ftp(s) // tftp // smb/cifs 📱 android app // iPhone shortcuts 👉 Get started! or visit the read only demo server 👀 running on a nuc in my basement 📷 screenshots: browser // upload // unpost // thumbnails // search // fsearch // zip DL // md viewer 🎬 videos: upload // cli upload // race the beam // 👉 feature showcase (youtube) built in Norway 🇳🇴 with contributions from not norway readme toc top…
read the full copyparty overview →
About xplr
▸[ xplr] A hackable, minimal, fast TUI file explorer [ Install ] [ Documentation ] [ Hacks ] [ Plugins ] [ Integrations ] xplr is a terminal UI based file explorer that aims to increase our terminal productivity by being a flexible, interactive orchestrator for the ever growing awesome command line utilities that work with the file system. To achieve its goal, xplr strives to be a fast, minimal and more importantly, hackable file explorer. xplr is not meant to be a replacement for the standard shell commands or the GUI file managers. Rather, it aims to [integrate them all][14] and expose an intuitive…
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More File Management & Sync projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.
Frequently asked questions
Is copyparty or xplr more popular?
copyparty has 47,277 GitHub stars and xplr has 4,851. copyparty has the larger community by that measure.
Are copyparty and xplr free?
Both are open source. copyparty is licensed under MIT and xplr under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between copyparty and xplr?
copyparty is written in Python and xplr in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, copyparty or xplr?
Choose copyparty if you want the larger community (47,277 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose xplr if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.