head to head · open source

copyparty vs xplr

copyparty has 46,774 GitHub stars, 1,905 forks, 252 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. xplr has 4,828 stars, 96 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. copyparty leads on adoption by 869% (46,774 vs 4,828 stars). copyparty is written in Python under MIT; xplr is written in Rust under MIT. copyparty has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, xplr 2%. xplr was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

copyparty ★ 47K xplr ★ 4.8K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

copyparty xplr
GitHub stars ★ 47K ★ 4.8K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python Rust
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-23
Forks ⑂ 1.9K ⑂ 96
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick copyparty if

  • You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full copyparty profile →

pick xplr if

  • You want the xplr feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and xplr fits your workflow better

full xplr profile →

About copyparty

copyparty is a portable file server that turns almost any device into a file server with resumable uploads and downloads through any web browser, built for self hosters, homelab operators, NAS owners and anyone who wants to share files directly from their own hardware.

read the full copyparty overview →

About xplr

xplr is a hackable, minimal and fast terminal UI file explorer, written in Rust and released under the MIT licence, for command line users who want a scriptable, keyboard controlled visual layer over the filesystem utilities they already run.

read the full xplr overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 206K Excalidraw ★ 133K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 93K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs copyparty localsend vs rclone localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

copyparty vs LocalSend copyparty vs rclone copyparty vs Files copyparty vs yazi copyparty vs Spacedrive copyparty vs Nextcloud copyparty vs uppy copyparty vs cloudreve copyparty vs superfile copyparty vs ranger copyparty vs Seafile copyparty vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is copyparty or xplr more popular?

copyparty has 46,774 GitHub stars and xplr has 4,828. copyparty has the larger community by that measure.

Are copyparty and xplr free?

Both are open source. copyparty is licensed under MIT and xplr under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between copyparty and xplr?

copyparty is written in Python and xplr in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, copyparty or xplr?

Choose copyparty if you want the larger community (46,774 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose xplr if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.