head to head · open source
copyparty vs updog
copyparty has 46,784 GitHub stars, 1,904 forks, 252 open issues and last shipped yesterday. updog has 3,412 stars, 341 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped 10 months ago. copyparty leads on adoption by 1,271% (46,784 vs 3,412 stars). copyparty is written in Python under MIT; updog is written in Python under MIT. copyparty has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, updog 10%. copyparty was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (file-sharing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| copyparty | updog | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 47K | ★ 3.4K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-09-24 | 2025-11-16 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.9K | ⑂ 341 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick copyparty if
- You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick updog if
- You want the updog feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and updog fits your workflow better
About copyparty
copyparty is a portable file server that turns almost any device into a file server with resumable uploads and downloads through any web browser, built for self hosters, homelab operators, NAS owners and anyone who wants to share files directly from their own hardware.
read the full copyparty overview →
About updog
Updog is a Python 3.11+ HTTP/S file server that replaces Python's SimpleHTTPServer, adding file uploads alongside downloads, ad hoc SSL certificates and HTTP basic authentication for developers and operators who need to move files between machines without standing up a full file sharing service.
read the full updog overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More File Management & Sync projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.
Frequently asked questions
Is copyparty or updog more popular?
copyparty has 46,784 GitHub stars and updog has 3,412. copyparty has the larger community by that measure.
Are copyparty and updog free?
Both are open source. copyparty is licensed under MIT and updog under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between copyparty and updog?
copyparty is written in Python and updog in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, copyparty or updog?
Choose copyparty if you want the larger community (46,784 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose updog if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.